Braxton Jones vs Orlando Brown Jr
Moderator: wab
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29951
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2036 times
- Yogi da Bear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2609
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:43 pm
- Has thanked: 228 times
- Been thanked: 404 times
Or just plain better...period.
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 12197
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 1255 times
- Been thanked: 2235 times
Lmao
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20673
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 235 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
Ahhh you beat me to it!
I'm a broken record here: If Braxton Jones can get stronger in his lower body/core, I think he'll be much improved this season.
Which begs the question: Why are we pushing for a high draft pick to play RT when Poles and friends found someone like Jones in round 5?
For the OL, find me a hardworking, intelligent athlete who hits your desired metrics and coach him up.
I'm a broken record here: If Braxton Jones can get stronger in his lower body/core, I think he'll be much improved this season.
Which begs the question: Why are we pushing for a high draft pick to play RT when Poles and friends found someone like Jones in round 5?
For the OL, find me a hardworking, intelligent athlete who hits your desired metrics and coach him up.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3896
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 629 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
For what it's worth: finding a starter at tackle in later rounds is still the exception, not the rule. Most (not all) come from the top three rounds of the draft.G08 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 10:21 am Ahhh you beat me to it!
I'm a broken record here: If Braxton Jones can get stronger in his lower body/core, I think he'll be much improved this season.
Which begs the question: Why are we pushing for a high draft pick to play RT when Poles and friends found someone like Jones in round 5?
For the OL, find me a hardworking, intelligent athlete who hits your desired metrics and coach him up.
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20673
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 235 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
Very true, but he is 1 for 1 thus far.thunderspirit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 10:55 amFor what it's worth: finding a starter at tackle in later rounds is still the exception, not the rule. Most (not all) come from the top three rounds of the draft.G08 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 10:21 am Ahhh you beat me to it!
I'm a broken record here: If Braxton Jones can get stronger in his lower body/core, I think he'll be much improved this season.
Which begs the question: Why are we pushing for a high draft pick to play RT when Poles and friends found someone like Jones in round 5?
For the OL, find me a hardworking, intelligent athlete who hits your desired metrics and coach him up.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 12197
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 1255 times
- Been thanked: 2235 times
No he's not. He drafted 4 OL last year, he's 1 for 4. And before we crown his ass, remember Larry Borom who everyone had similar love for last year and regressed. He also whiffed on his FA signings. I'm seeing a new apologism trend on this board - Poles Apologists. He can do no wrong!G08 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 11:22 amVery true, but he is 1 for 1 thus far.thunderspirit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 10:55 am
For what it's worth: finding a starter at tackle in later rounds is still the exception, not the rule. Most (not all) come from the top three rounds of the draft.
- IE
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 12500
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
- Location: Plymouth, MI
- Has thanked: 523 times
- Been thanked: 700 times
- Contact:
Even if we view PFF's take on the two as not really reflecting reality (there are implications to that - are they credible, or not - and why), there is still a good case ot be made for Brax.
We do have to attribute *some* meaning to PFF's grades... they're generally accepted for player benchmarking. But then IF you apply their relative costs AND look at where they are on their development curve, their long-term utility as a rationale to invest their time in one spot and their potential upside, I'd grade Brax Jones as a more valuable asset than Orlando Bloom Jones right now.
We might want to consider that OBJ has already sort of proved he is NOT necessarily the top-performing long term fixture on the left that Brax Jones still could very well be. OBJ has proved to both the Raven and the Chief that he's not that guy. Of course he IS a very good OT and commands & is worthy of big bucks. But it seems the league considers him a RT. He's struggling with that, and has for a long time. But he'll come around to it.
If the Bears can get him at RT for $17-18MM that would seem to be a bargain and a material upgrade. It would also clear the draft day path to focus on defense.
But ONLY at right tackle - no way would I take a guy who already proved he's a RT on two good teams and pay him a ton of money to disrupt the growth of an ascending LT! That would be... nuts.
We do have to attribute *some* meaning to PFF's grades... they're generally accepted for player benchmarking. But then IF you apply their relative costs AND look at where they are on their development curve, their long-term utility as a rationale to invest their time in one spot and their potential upside, I'd grade Brax Jones as a more valuable asset than Orlando Bloom Jones right now.
We might want to consider that OBJ has already sort of proved he is NOT necessarily the top-performing long term fixture on the left that Brax Jones still could very well be. OBJ has proved to both the Raven and the Chief that he's not that guy. Of course he IS a very good OT and commands & is worthy of big bucks. But it seems the league considers him a RT. He's struggling with that, and has for a long time. But he'll come around to it.
If the Bears can get him at RT for $17-18MM that would seem to be a bargain and a material upgrade. It would also clear the draft day path to focus on defense.
But ONLY at right tackle - no way would I take a guy who already proved he's a RT on two good teams and pay him a ton of money to disrupt the growth of an ascending LT! That would be... nuts.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29951
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2036 times
He only “does wrong” when he doesn’t do something youdplank wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 11:28 amNo he's not. He drafted 4 OL last year, he's 1 for 4. And before we crown his ass, remember Larry Borom who everyone had similar love for last year and regressed. He also whiffed on his FA signings. I'm seeing a new apologism trend on this board - Poles Apologists. He can do no wrong!
have your heart set on.
No one loves that the Bears haven’t signed a RT but he hasn’t. So the board is drawing logical conclusions as to why he hasn’t (cost/fit/age) and trying to deduce how he will handle it.
I certainly am not thrilled with how FA has transpired, but I can at least understand why it’s gone this way.
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3896
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 629 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
Pretty much. (Though I'm less unhappy about RT than some.)wab wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 11:41 amHe only “does wrong” when he doesn’t do something youdplank wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 11:28 am
No he's not. He drafted 4 OL last year, he's 1 for 4. And before we crown his ass, remember Larry Borom who everyone had similar love for last year and regressed. He also whiffed on his FA signings. I'm seeing a new apologism trend on this board - Poles Apologists. He can do no wrong!
have your heart set on.
No one loves that the Bears haven’t signed a RT but he hasn’t. So the board is drawing logical conclusions as to why he hasn’t (cost/fit/age) and trying to deduce how he will handle it.
I certainly am not thrilled with how FA has transpired, but I can at least understand why it’s gone this way.
If someone want to call it rationalization and/or apologism, that's their prerogative.
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
- IE
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 12500
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
- Location: Plymouth, MI
- Has thanked: 523 times
- Been thanked: 700 times
- Contact:
Conflating the Jones pick with the other later development ones and small attempts to improve team depth is completely and horribly unfair.dplank wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 11:28 amNo he's not. He drafted 4 OL last year, he's 1 for 4. And before we crown his ass, remember Larry Borom who everyone had similar love for last year and regressed. He also whiffed on his FA signings. I'm seeing a new apologism trend on this board - Poles Apologists. He can do no wrong!
Make fun all you want of other people appreciating the regime's ability to find a legit LT in the 5th round when everyone else missed him. That's a real success story, and the later picks and flyers on guys like Leatherwood and what's his name from Minnesota do not remotely color that.
This continuing "Poles Stan" characterization is 3rd grade playground stuff. Nobody is at where you claim them to be at, Plank. People just like what they like and better (than you) tolerate the stuff they don't due to context.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20673
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 235 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
dplank wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 11:28 amNo he's not. He drafted 4 OL last year, he's 1 for 4. And before we crown his ass, remember Larry Borom who everyone had similar love for last year and regressed. He also whiffed on his FA signings. I'm seeing a new apologism trend on this board - Poles Apologists. He can do no wrong!
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- Yogi da Bear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2609
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:43 pm
- Has thanked: 228 times
- Been thanked: 404 times
A little unfair as to the draft picks: Kramer got hurt and missed the entire year; Thomas was poached off our practice squad by the Rams and is still on their roster; Carter has flashed and might be a factor going forward. I would say he has one tremendous success story and three with the jury still out.dplank wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 11:28 amNo he's not. He drafted 4 OL last year, he's 1 for 4. And before we crown his ass, remember Larry Borom who everyone had similar love for last year and regressed. He also whiffed on his FA signings. I'm seeing a new apologism trend on this board - Poles Apologists. He can do no wrong!
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 12197
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 1255 times
- Been thanked: 2235 times
That's right! I can actually like some things he does and dislike others! Crazy concept that doesn't seem to translate on places like this where you have to be all or nothing. At the point I made that comment, I was liking what he was doing and expecting that to be the start, not the finish of his starter grade acquisitions. As things wore on and I realized that didn't look like it was happening, I soured on it. That's actually sane, normal behavior. It means I'm commenting on the actual moves and not beholden to either defending or tearing down Poles - I call what I see. What's not normal is praising everything Poles does as if he's incapable of making a mistake.G08 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 11:56 amdplank wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 11:28 am
No he's not. He drafted 4 OL last year, he's 1 for 4. And before we crown his ass, remember Larry Borom who everyone had similar love for last year and regressed. He also whiffed on his FA signings. I'm seeing a new apologism trend on this board - Poles Apologists. He can do no wrong!
Also, I think I'm a lot younger than you think I am.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20673
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 235 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
Was just a joke buddplank wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:07 pmThat's right! I can actually like some things he does and dislike others! Crazy concept that doesn't seem to translate on places like this where you have to be all or nothing. At the point I made that comment, I was liking what he was doing and expecting that to be the start, not the finish of his starter grade acquisitions. As things wore on and I realized that didn't look like it was happening, I soured on it. That's actually sane, normal behavior. It means I'm commenting on the actual moves and not beholden to either defending or tearing down Poles - I call what I see. What's not normal is praising everything Poles does as if he's incapable of making a mistake.
Also, I think I'm a lot younger than you think I am.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
-
- MVP
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:57 pm
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 120 times
1-4 seems like you’re just trying to hate. If a guy you’re hiding on the practice squad is poached to another team’s roster and stays there that’s not a miss. If a guy makes you’re roster as a backup that’s not a miss. If a guy goes on IR before he plays, that’s not a miss yet.
Come on dude, expecting late round draft picks to come in and immediately start is a ridiculous standard.
Anyway, if the reports about the league and Poles viewing Brown as a RT I don’t think the comparison matters. I’m hopeful that when the Brown realizes the market and the Bears cap situation he decides getting or beating the McGlinchey deal is the best he can do and agree to be the RT for the Bears.
Come on dude, expecting late round draft picks to come in and immediately start is a ridiculous standard.
Anyway, if the reports about the league and Poles viewing Brown as a RT I don’t think the comparison matters. I’m hopeful that when the Brown realizes the market and the Bears cap situation he decides getting or beating the McGlinchey deal is the best he can do and agree to be the RT for the Bears.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29951
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2036 times
Brown looking like he might have to take a 1yr deal as a RT and try to cash in next year as a LT.
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6921
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 395 times
- Been thanked: 712 times
Ok, I'll bite
What's TE Mike Gesicki so defensive about?
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- karhu
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:20 pm
- Has thanked: 297 times
- Been thanked: 385 times
Tackle. The position under discussion was tackle. Poles took one, along with two developmental guards and a center. The one tackle he picked, hit.
So much road and so few places, so much friendliness and so little intimacy, so much flavour and so little taste.
Friendship is better than fighting, but fighting is more useful.
Friendship is better than fighting, but fighting is more useful.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5015
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1220 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
The topline PFF grade is such a huge grain of salt. If we take all their ratings at face value, Brown is much better as a pass blocker as well and in true pass sets is significantly better.
The logical conclusion of that set of grades is Jones was just helped a lot more. Brown was probably left on islands Getsy wouldn't have dreamed of leaving Jones on. Imagine Kelce having to chip or stay in totally because a Braxton Jones cant be left on an island.
Brown is far from perfect and there's especially run scheme questions.
But these "one number grade from PFF" comparisons just don't scratch surface of actual issues at hand.
The logical conclusion of that set of grades is Jones was just helped a lot more. Brown was probably left on islands Getsy wouldn't have dreamed of leaving Jones on. Imagine Kelce having to chip or stay in totally because a Braxton Jones cant be left on an island.
Brown is far from perfect and there's especially run scheme questions.
But these "one number grade from PFF" comparisons just don't scratch surface of actual issues at hand.
- IE
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 12500
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
- Location: Plymouth, MI
- Has thanked: 523 times
- Been thanked: 700 times
- Contact:
I really don't know PFF's methodology, and may be learning something here. Your point would confirm that not all BJs are the same. If they're totally abstracting things like blocking help yes you're right that would be misleading. I'd love to see the breakdown at lower levels, situationally.The Cooler King wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:45 pm The topline PFF grade is such a huge grain of salt. If we take all their ratings at face value, Brown is much better as a pass blocker as well and in true pass sets is significantly better.
The logical conclusion of that set of grades is Jones was just helped a lot more. Brown was probably left on islands Getsy wouldn't have dreamed of leaving Jones on. Imagine Kelce having to chip or stay in totally because a Braxton Jones cant be left on an island.
Brown is far from perfect and there's especially run scheme questions.
But these "one number grade from PFF" comparisons just don't scratch surface of actual issues at hand.
I still assert that other factors raise Brax Jones and lower Bloom Jones. Not the least of which is two good teams have concluded the latter is not a LT while the arrow is pointing up on the junior one more than the Junior one.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5015
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1220 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
I mean I can't claim knowledge about PFFs methods. I know all their grading goes through some sort of algorithm.IE wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:50 pmI really don't know PFF's methodology, and may be learning something here. Your point would confirm that not all BJs are the same. If they're totally abstracting things like blocking help yes you're right that would be misleading. I'd love to see the breakdown at lower levels, situationally.The Cooler King wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:45 pm The topline PFF grade is such a huge grain of salt. If we take all their ratings at face value, Brown is much better as a pass blocker as well and in true pass sets is significantly better.
The logical conclusion of that set of grades is Jones was just helped a lot more. Brown was probably left on islands Getsy wouldn't have dreamed of leaving Jones on. Imagine Kelce having to chip or stay in totally because a Braxton Jones cant be left on an island.
Brown is far from perfect and there's especially run scheme questions.
But these "one number grade from PFF" comparisons just don't scratch surface of actual issues at hand.
I still assert that other factors raise Brax Jones and lower Bloom Jones. Not the least of which is two good teams have concluded the latter is not a LT while the arrow is pointing up on the junior one more than the Junior one.
In implementing a grade scale, there's always pros and cons to your two options
1. Grade a person on how well they completed their assignment
2. Grade people based on a combination of how they completed the assignment and how difficult it was
Based on what I can tell I think they lean more towards one. It's an editorial choice. At the end of the day that top line number is kind of a marketing number. Throw out this single number and get people interested in details behind a pay wall. That's how I view it.
Just their charting of plays is really useful though. And I like their fantasy football content. So I'm gonna be the goober who pays and I'll share what I can of the behind the pay wall stuff when I can.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29951
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2036 times
He’s pretty clear in the tweet that:
1 - it’s just one data point
And
2 - it’s reasonable of the Bears to stick with Jones because he’s performing and exponentially cheaper.
1 - it’s just one data point
And
2 - it’s reasonable of the Bears to stick with Jones because he’s performing and exponentially cheaper.
- karhu
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:20 pm
- Has thanked: 297 times
- Been thanked: 385 times
Story checks out. I mean, there are more fun ways to learn that sort of thing, but some of them are painful, too.IE wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:50 pmI really don't know PFF's methodology, and may be learning something here. Your point would confirm that not all BJs are the same.The Cooler King wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:45 pm The topline PFF grade is such a huge grain of salt. If we take all their ratings at face value, Brown is much better as a pass blocker as well and in true pass sets is significantly better.
The logical conclusion of that set of grades is Jones was just helped a lot more. Brown was probably left on islands Getsy wouldn't have dreamed of leaving Jones on. Imagine Kelce having to chip or stay in totally because a Braxton Jones cant be left on an island.
Brown is far from perfect and there's especially run scheme questions.
But these "one number grade from PFF" comparisons just don't scratch surface of actual issues at hand.
So much road and so few places, so much friendliness and so little intimacy, so much flavour and so little taste.
Friendship is better than fighting, but fighting is more useful.
Friendship is better than fighting, but fighting is more useful.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:56 am
- Has thanked: 2068 times
- Been thanked: 386 times
Who cares who is better, there is room for both! Convince Brown to flip to the right if you dont want to move Jones.
Jones/Davis/John Michael Schmitz(or equivalent)/Jenkins/Brown.
I'd be OK with that....
....and yes i'd still draft Paris Johnson or Broderick Jones at 9
Jones/Davis/John Michael Schmitz(or equivalent)/Jenkins/Brown.
I'd be OK with that....
....and yes i'd still draft Paris Johnson or Broderick Jones at 9
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11083
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 525 times
This draft is DEEP with potential mid round RT’s. Poles might take 2-3 OL in rounds 2-4. We could easily find a RT in that group. Right now JONES is rounding out into a quality LT. you don’t dump him, take on 10x the contract, only to get marginally better at the position.
- Yogi da Bear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2609
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:43 pm
- Has thanked: 228 times
- Been thanked: 404 times
I hate PFF grades. Hate them. Think they're crap.The Cooler King wrote: ↑Wed Mar 15, 2023 12:45 pm The topline PFF grade is such a huge grain of salt. If we take all their ratings at face value, Brown is much better as a pass blocker as well and in true pass sets is significantly better.
The logical conclusion of that set of grades is Jones was just helped a lot more. Brown was probably left on islands Getsy wouldn't have dreamed of leaving Jones on. Imagine Kelce having to chip or stay in totally because a Braxton Jones cant be left on an island.
Brown is far from perfect and there's especially run scheme questions.
But these "one number grade from PFF" comparisons just don't scratch surface of actual issues at hand.
But I did want to bring up one thing on this. I believe that Jones was helped far more by Fields than anything else. How many times did you see Fields escape out to his left? Seems to me it was a lot. In a sense, Jones' weakness corelated with Fields' strength, while Jones' strength helped protect Fields. With Jones, not many are getting around him, so Fields wasn't subjected to many unobstructed blind side hits--the QB killers. In fact, I can't think of any. What Jones was weak at were bullrushes. With those though, Jones still kept his body between Fields and the rusher, allowing Fields to see what was happening and escape to his left, around the occupied rusher. In the Lions game, we saw what would happen if Fields couldn't move--he was sacked as Jones was bullrushed into him. I think that was the only time I saw that happen.
Fields' real problem with bull rushes were when they came up the middle. When they came from the side, Fields could escape as the bull rushers were losing contain.
Just a thought I'd mention as I don't believe it has been discussed before.