2024 NFL Rule Changes

For all non-Bears happenings in the National Football League

Moderator: wab

Post Reply
User avatar
Atkins&Rebel
Head Coach
Posts: 2161
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 117 times

Article in the Athletic discussing the new NFLPA executive director Lloyd Howell's position on some rule changes after talking with all 32 teams' reps and numerous owners:

-Wants fines lessened further or removed for sports betting on non football bets:
Legalized sports betting and the explosion of social media have also impacted players because now they often receive ridicule from fans who lost money because a player didn’t hit a certain benchmark on a parlay. Other times, in instances where they do succeed, fans bombard them on social media with praise, creating a mental rollercoaster of sorts.
-Playing surfaces are a real concern:
Howell said Wednesday an NFLPA survey of 1,700 players revealed 92 percent of players prefer high-quality natural grass fields to artificial turf. Some owners are resistant to change because of the financial cost involved in switching to grass surfaces, and Goodell said earlier this week the solution could involve finding a hybrid type of surface.

News broke this week that MetLife Stadium will host a World Cup game in 2025, and to satisfy the demand of international soccer players, a natural grass surface will temporarily replace the field turf surface the New York Giants and New York Jets play on — a surface players have been very vocal in blaming for injuries.
This offseason could impact how the Bears build their stadium and how current dome teams manage their playing surfaces as well.

-Drop Hip Tackles not seen as a safety liability by many players:
In another safety-related matter, players were asked about discussions on the NFL competition committee eventually moving to make the hip-drop tackle illegal because of the belief it leads to serious injury. NFLPA leaders — players on both sides of the ball — made it clear they see no reason to outlaw the tackle because it’s simply a football play.

“I don’t really know how to play football, if they actually put that rule into effect,” [Michael] Thomas said.

[Calais] Campbell expounded: “Yes, it’s about making the game safer and there are a lot of rules that were put in place over the last 10-plus years, you know, that made the game a lot safer and they were big adjustments for players. But I felt like, with this in particular, I just don’t understand how you can police it the right way and allow us to do our job.
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7173
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 517 times
Been thanked: 846 times

Good to hear push back from players on hip drop tackles. It's funny to think of it from a wr's prospective too: you want to tackle a linebacker? Either you hip drop them, or you take out his knees.

Imo outlawing hip drops will just further increase leg injuries.
Image
User avatar
HisRoyalSweetness
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5636
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 1555 times

† The NFL has been testing optical tracking devices that could eventually replace the chain gang on first-down measurements, NFL Network reported. The league won’t consider using the technology until at least 2025.

† The league is not expected to outlaw the “Tush Push” or change the rule that awards a touchback when the ball is fumbled through the end zone at next month’s annual meeting, but it could outlaw the hip-drop tackle.

https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears/2024 ... khan-draft
User avatar
Atkins&Rebel
Head Coach
Posts: 2161
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 117 times

I grew up with it being illegal for an offensive player to physically assist the ball carrier in any way other than blocking opponents who are not engaged in tackling the ball carrier. I find the tush push the abhorrent result of allowing offensive linemen/blockers to "move the piles" from behind...whenever that was instituted.
So I wouldn't make a rule to outlaw the tush push per say, but I would return to the old rule where no offensive player may physically assist the ball carrier once engaged with a defender. So no more rugby scrums at all.
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4481
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 622 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Atkins&Rebel wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2024 10:56 pm I grew up with it being illegal for an offensive player to physically assist the ball carrier in any way other than blocking opponents who are not engaged in tackling the ball carrier. I find the tush push the abhorrent result of allowing offensive linemen/blockers to "move the piles" from behind...whenever that was instituted.
So I wouldn't make a rule to outlaw the tush push per say, but I would return to the old rule where no offensive player may physically assist the ball carrier once engaged with a defender. So no more rugby scrums at all.
100%
Post Reply