Denver cuts Russell Wilson, to eat $85mil in dead cap
Moderator: wab
- alexwilkins
- MVP
- Posts: 1017
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 2:00 am
- Location: North Pole, AK
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
- LacertineForest
- MVP
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Has thanked: 2238 times
- Been thanked: 395 times
Absolutely insane amount of dead money. I wonder if Pittsburgh will sign him now.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 30410
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 2267 times
Good god...I can't believe I was on board with Pace offering the moon for him. I'm also glad that the Seahawks said no when he did.
How does this not cripple the Broncos for the next two years?
How does this not cripple the Broncos for the next two years?
- Ditka’s dictaphone
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4211
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 951 times
Agreed, thank you Seattle
Where now for Wilson?
Do Denver want Fields?
Will they offer the moon for #1 pick?
(26/09/2023) Winner of the inaugural
- HisRoyalSweetness
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7362
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 2489 times
Can they afford to offer the moon for the #1 pick given how much they've given up in recent years for Wilson and then Payton, not to mention that almighty $85m in dead cap over the next two seasons?Ditka’s dictaphone wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 6:32 pm Where now for Wilson?
Do Denver want Fields?
Will they offer the moon for #1 pick?
Frankly I'm amazed George Paton still has a job. If I was the Broncos' owner I certainly wouldn't trust him with any more trade deals.
They surely have to get a QB though. Can they really go into the season with Stidham and DiNucci who have 5 starts between them? Maybe if they plan to completely tank for a year but they have still have some talent on their roster. I mean they clearly thought they were just a QB away from being contenders when they traded for Wilson.
Arise Sir Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXdXRP6Hi-U
- Rusty Trombagent
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7712
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Maine!
- Has thanked: 665 times
- Been thanked: 1227 times
Man, I hope they really like Nix or Penix
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 13110
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 1491 times
- Been thanked: 2623 times
- spudbear
- MVP
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:32 pm
- Has thanked: 321 times
- Been thanked: 163 times
That was my first thought, we're lucky the Bears are not in cap-hell with what Pace could have done. Poles still had to clean house and rebuild though.
Denver will be spreading out the $85M cap-hit poison over two years:
Ouch. There is talk about him going to Vegas, where he could again stick it to the Broncos on the field twice a year. Maybe Atlanta has a better shot at reaching the playoffs? Or Pittsburgh??... with a post-June 1 designation. Denver will be left with cap hits of $35.4 million in 2024 and $49.6 million in 2025 before being free of the QB’s contract in 2026. Because the quarterback was already going to have a $35.4 million salary cap hit this season, his release technically does not put the team in a bigger cap hole than they already were in 2024 (the Broncos are about $14 million over the cap).
Wilson will be paid by Denver no matter what, so it makes more sense for him to give his next team a bargain, perhaps signing for the league minimum ($1.21 million). That would help out his next club while sticking it to the Broncos, and he’ll get paid regardless, so it’s the most likely outcome.
San Francisco has always been my favorite booing city. I don't mean the people boo louder or longer, but there is a very special intimacy. Music, that's what it is to me. One time in Kezar Stadium they gave me a standing boo.
George Halas
George Halas
- alexwilkins
- MVP
- Posts: 1017
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 2:00 am
- Location: North Pole, AK
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
If I understood what was said here correctly, whatever his next team pays him will be subtracted from what the Broncos owe him. So, say we sign him for a minimum for him, which is like $1.6mil, he’ll still get like $39mil from Denver. Which is appealing to me.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8560
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 575 times
- Been thanked: 687 times
Yep and he will want a 1 Year Deal to try and rehab his value tooalexwilkins wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 2:26 pm
If I understood what was said here correctly, whatever his next team pays him will be subtracted from what the Broncos owe him. So, say we sign him for a minimum for him, which is like $1.6mil, he’ll still get like $39mil from Denver. Which is appealing to me.
- Rusty Trombagent
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7712
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Maine!
- Has thanked: 665 times
- Been thanked: 1227 times
great reason to revisit russ' lasting cultural impact:
- Heinz D.
- MVP
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2022 4:29 pm
- Location: Tri-State area
- Has thanked: 1313 times
- Been thanked: 249 times
They're going to. He'll compete with Pickett for the starting job.LacertineForest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 5:27 pm Absolutely insane amount of dead money. I wonder if Pittsburgh will sign him now.
I dunno...divine intervention?
My mother's love was inexplicably linked to kickball.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
Interesting what happened to Wilson when he got taken away from Pete Carroll and then in the earlier years that defense.
It's almost like a QB needs a support system in the form of a good HC and teammates to be successful.
- LacertineForest
- MVP
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Has thanked: 2238 times
- Been thanked: 395 times
Yes, but it doesn't guarantee success if a QB doesn't have it in the first place (Trubisky comes to mind). It's not like Wilson didn't have good years after the Legion of Boom was dismantled. You can't just throw a dude to the wolves with no support, but you also need the right guy to elevate the team to the highest level.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 4:19 amInteresting what happened to Wilson when he got taken away from Pete Carroll and then in the earlier years that defense.
It's almost like a QB needs a support system in the form of a good HC and teammates to be successful.
- HisRoyalSweetness
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7362
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 2489 times
Are you suggesting Sean Payton isn't a good HC?The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 4:19 am Interesting what happened to Wilson when he got taken away from Pete Carroll and then in the earlier years that defense.
It's almost like a QB needs a support system in the form of a good HC and teammates to be successful.
Statistically Wilson had a productive season. He ranked 8th with a 98.0 passer rating, 9th in TD passes (26) and 3rd in TD% (5.5), threw only 8 INTs with an INT% of 1.8 and completed 66.4% of his passes (13th). He had a passer rating over 100 in 8 out of 15 games he played and over 90 in another 3.
The problem is it didn't result in much in the way of yards and points, Payton and Wilson clearly didn't get on, Wilson's contract was problematic and he wasn't prepared to accept changes to his guarantees.
Arise Sir Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXdXRP6Hi-U
- Rusty Trombagent
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7712
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Maine!
- Has thanked: 665 times
- Been thanked: 1227 times
It really is funny because the whole thing with Denver was they were a QB away from being a serious superbowl contender.HisRoyalSweetness wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 8:07 amAre you suggesting Sean Payton isn't a good HC?The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 4:19 am Interesting what happened to Wilson when he got taken away from Pete Carroll and then in the earlier years that defense.
It's almost like a QB needs a support system in the form of a good HC and teammates to be successful.
Statistically Wilson had a productive season. He ranked 8th with a 98.0 passer rating, 9th in TD passes (26) and 3rd in TD% (5.5), threw only 8 INTs with an INT% of 1.8 and completed 66.4% of his passes (13th). He had a passer rating over 100 in 8 out of 15 games he played and over 90 in another 3.
The problem is it didn't result in much in the way of yards and points, Payton and Wilson clearly didn't get on, Wilson's contract was problematic and he wasn't prepared to accept changes to his guarantees.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
You either didn’t read the whole post or you deliberately ignored the other half.HisRoyalSweetness wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 8:07 amAre you suggesting Sean Payton isn't a good HC?The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 4:19 am Interesting what happened to Wilson when he got taken away from Pete Carroll and then in the earlier years that defense.
It's almost like a QB needs a support system in the form of a good HC and teammates to be successful.
Statistically Wilson had a productive season. He ranked 8th with a 98.0 passer rating, 9th in TD passes (26) and 3rd in TD% (5.5), threw only 8 INTs with an INT% of 1.8 and completed 66.4% of his passes (13th). He had a passer rating over 100 in 8 out of 15 games he played and over 90 in another 3.
The problem is it didn't result in much in the way of yards and points, Payton and Wilson clearly didn't get on, Wilson's contract was problematic and he wasn't prepared to accept changes to his guarantees.
What was the support system or quality of teammates like in Denver?
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 30410
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 2267 times
In 2022 his support system in Denver was arguably as good or better than it was when he made a pro bowl in Seattle the year before. The issue was that Hackett was an absolute buffoon and essentially gave Russ total autonomy over the offense.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 8:55 amYou either didn’t read the whole post or you deliberately ignored the other half.HisRoyalSweetness wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 8:07 am
Are you suggesting Sean Payton isn't a good HC?
Statistically Wilson had a productive season. He ranked 8th with a 98.0 passer rating, 9th in TD passes (26) and 3rd in TD% (5.5), threw only 8 INTs with an INT% of 1.8 and completed 66.4% of his passes (13th). He had a passer rating over 100 in 8 out of 15 games he played and over 90 in another 3.
The problem is it didn't result in much in the way of yards and points, Payton and Wilson clearly didn't get on, Wilson's contract was problematic and he wasn't prepared to accept changes to his guarantees.
What was the support system or quality of teammates like in Denver?
In 2023 his offense remained largely the same, but the defense was...inconsistent at best. The problem then became that Russ had been given so much power, it was hard for Sean Payton to come in and put that toothpaste back in the tube. So they butted heads.
The reasons Russ failed in Denver were not due to his talent or his supporting cast. It was because the entire situation was mismanaged.
- crueltyabc
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5177
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 7:36 pm
- Location: Dallas TX
- Has thanked: 94 times
- Been thanked: 250 times
He could still succeed in the right situation but he no longer has the ability to elevate a team. He is no longer athletic enough to extend plays to compensate for bad oline and he's always been limited in terms of his ability to throw to the middle of the field. His veteran savvy and leadership is offset by his cringey personality. I can't currently think of a situation where he makes sense and def don't want him in Chicago.
xyt in the discord chats
- LacertineForest
- MVP
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Has thanked: 2238 times
- Been thanked: 395 times
Why wouldn't the Raiders sign him to a vet minimum deal? You make the (arch rival) Broncos eat as much of that money as possible, get a cheap QB for a couple of years, and he could be a pretty decent player for them when paired up with Adams, Jacobs, etc. Would Russ be okay with a vet minimum deal if he still makes $40+ mil per year total? It would certainly allow Vegas to buy some nice pieces around him.
- o-pus #40 in B major
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2859
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:27 pm
- Location: Earth
- Has thanked: 2665 times
- Been thanked: 279 times
If you were Russ would you be interested in a vet minimum deal right now?LacertineForest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:41 am Why wouldn't the Raiders sign him to a vet minimum deal? You make the (arch rival) Broncos eat as much of that money as possible, get a cheap QB for a couple of years, and he could be a pretty decent player for them when paired up with Adams, Jacobs, etc. Would Russ be okay with a vet minimum deal if he still makes $40+ mil per year total? It would certainly allow Vegas to buy some nice pieces around him.
There is a GM named Poles
Who has a clear set of goals
He’s rebuilt his team
So Bears’ fans can dream
Of winning some more Super Bowls
- HRS
Who has a clear set of goals
He’s rebuilt his team
So Bears’ fans can dream
Of winning some more Super Bowls
- HRS
- LacertineForest
- MVP
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Has thanked: 2238 times
- Been thanked: 395 times
How much is he realistically going to make? Probably not more than $37 million per year or whatever the Broncos owe him. If no team will give him that much, why not stick it to the Broncos and take the money mostly off the Broncos rather than your new team, who will have more resources to use on players then. There might even be a way to structure a contract so that the two years where the new team pays the vet minimum for the two years the Broncos are on the hook, but then guarantees him money (via workout bonuses or whatever) in year 3 or beyond. Of course, Russ would want it structured so he'd still get that money if they cut him, but I'm sure there's a way to make that work.pus wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 1:07 pmIf you were Russ would you be interested in a vet minimum deal right now?LacertineForest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:41 am Why wouldn't the Raiders sign him to a vet minimum deal? You make the (arch rival) Broncos eat as much of that money as possible, get a cheap QB for a couple of years, and he could be a pretty decent player for them when paired up with Adams, Jacobs, etc. Would Russ be okay with a vet minimum deal if he still makes $40+ mil per year total? It would certainly allow Vegas to buy some nice pieces around him.
- o-pus #40 in B major
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2859
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:27 pm
- Location: Earth
- Has thanked: 2665 times
- Been thanked: 279 times
That's all well and good, but if I was Russ I would use a bit of the Broncos money that they owe me - rent a fishing boat with a (deluxe) exclusive office and retire into the sunrise.LacertineForest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 1:19 pmHow much is he realistically going to make? Probably not more than $37 million per year or whatever the Broncos owe him. If no team will give him that much, why not stick it to the Broncos and take the money mostly off the Broncos rather than your new team, who will have more resources to use on players then. There might even be a way to structure a contract so that the two years where the new team pays the vet minimum for the two years the Broncos are on the hook, but then guarantees him money (via workout bonuses or whatever) in year 3 or beyond. Of course, Russ would want it structured so he'd still get that money if they cut him, but I'm sure there's a way to make that work.
There is a GM named Poles
Who has a clear set of goals
He’s rebuilt his team
So Bears’ fans can dream
Of winning some more Super Bowls
- HRS
Who has a clear set of goals
He’s rebuilt his team
So Bears’ fans can dream
Of winning some more Super Bowls
- HRS
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 30410
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 2267 times
If he retires he doesn't get that money. At least not all of it.pus wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 1:28 pmThat's all well and good, but if I was Russ I would use a bit of the Broncos money that they owe me - rent a fishing boat with a (deluxe) exclusive office and retire into the sunrise.LacertineForest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 1:19 pm
How much is he realistically going to make? Probably not more than $37 million per year or whatever the Broncos owe him. If no team will give him that much, why not stick it to the Broncos and take the money mostly off the Broncos rather than your new team, who will have more resources to use on players then. There might even be a way to structure a contract so that the two years where the new team pays the vet minimum for the two years the Broncos are on the hook, but then guarantees him money (via workout bonuses or whatever) in year 3 or beyond. Of course, Russ would want it structured so he'd still get that money if they cut him, but I'm sure there's a way to make that work.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 30410
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 2267 times
He's going to go somewhere for a year, play for 4 million, collect 34 from the Broncos and try to increase his value. He's 35 and healthy...so he's got 3-5 years left in him.
He can collect Broncos checks for two years and then get one last meaningful 2-3 year deal and try to win another ring.
He can collect Broncos checks for two years and then get one last meaningful 2-3 year deal and try to win another ring.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8560
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 575 times
- Been thanked: 687 times
Why wouldn't you be?pus wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 1:07 pmIf you were Russ would you be interested in a vet minimum deal right now?LacertineForest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:41 am Why wouldn't the Raiders sign him to a vet minimum deal? You make the (arch rival) Broncos eat as much of that money as possible, get a cheap QB for a couple of years, and he could be a pretty decent player for them when paired up with Adams, Jacobs, etc. Would Russ be okay with a vet minimum deal if he still makes $40+ mil per year total? It would certainly allow Vegas to buy some nice pieces around him.
- Boris13c
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 16007
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
- Location: The Bear Nebula
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
if he wants to continue playing he will ... gone are the days when he could set his own price ... plus, thanks to the Broncos, his primary interest should not be $$$ ... it should be finding a team that actually wants himpus wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 1:07 pmIf you were Russ would you be interested in a vet minimum deal right now?LacertineForest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:41 am Why wouldn't the Raiders sign him to a vet minimum deal? You make the (arch rival) Broncos eat as much of that money as possible, get a cheap QB for a couple of years, and he could be a pretty decent player for them when paired up with Adams, Jacobs, etc. Would Russ be okay with a vet minimum deal if he still makes $40+ mil per year total? It would certainly allow Vegas to buy some nice pieces around him.
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
George Carlin
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8560
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 575 times
- Been thanked: 687 times
Well it's also - How does say a $ 4 million deal (or even $10 million 1 year deal) Help Wilson when there is an Offset in that Denver contract and anything less than like a $37-38 million deal (Something like that - Basically a Number he AINT approaching)
So anything over the Vet Min - just helps Denver. It does NOT put extra money in Wilsons pocket. And a Vet Min contract makes him more attractive to a New Team AND lets them have more Cap Room to put talent around you. And is a FU to Denver. Win-Win-Win for him
If anything for Wilson - I'd want a crazy weird contract. Like basically If I'm healthy and don't play 75% of the starting snaps in a game I get a Million Dollar bonus per game. Basically incentives for the New Team to start me and make it a negative if they bench me