Justin Fields Megathread - Steelers Edition

For all non-Bears happenings in the National Football League

Moderator: wab

Locked
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15163
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 2098 times
Been thanked: 3587 times

Rooting for injury here, bad person or not lol
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 32164
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 3378 times

Yeah, I mean I'm not rooting for some life altering injury. Give me a high ankle sprain, turf toe, broken fingers on his throwing hand... something minor that keeps him out for a handful of games.
User avatar
Arkansasbear
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6056
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
Has thanked: 616 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

wab wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2024 11:08 am Yeah, I mean I'm not rooting for some life altering injury. Give me a high ankle sprain, turf toe, broken fingers on his throwing hand... something minor that keeps him out for a handful of games.
Or just super poor performance
User avatar
HisRoyalSweetness
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9313
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 3618 times

Fields had a couple of carries today in the Steeler win over the Ravens so add those to his snap count!

Wilson's closing in on 300 snaps whilst Fields is just shy of 400 so still all to play for! :applaud:
User avatar
Arkansasbear
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6056
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
Has thanked: 616 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

HisRoyalSweetness wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2024 7:20 pm Fields had a couple of carries today in the Steeler win over the Ravens so add those to his snap count!

Wilson's closing in on 300 snaps whilst Fields is just shy of 400 so still all to play for! :applaud:
How great would it be for Fields to end up starting the last few games and he wins by a snap thanks to those carries.
User avatar
HisRoyalSweetness
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9313
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 3618 times

It was even better. Fields played 3 snaps!

The Steelers have run 654 plays plus had 64 snaps on which there were accepted penalties, so 718 plays altogether.

Fields has played 398 snaps so currently 55.4%.

He'll likely fall below the 51% threshold after the Steelers next game assuming Wilson remains healthy.

At their current rate the Steelers will play around 1,220 snaps by the end of the regular season. (I assume the trade clause doesn't include playoffs.)

The target for Fields is therefore around 623 snaps, so another 225, to hit 51%.

The Steelers averaged fewer plays with Fields starting (65 versus a season average of 72) so that would likely require him to play 3.5 full games. That's half of those they have remaining.
Ditka’s dictaphone
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5545
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
Has thanked: 1266 times
Been thanked: 1313 times

Is the target 51% or 50.1%?
Taking a break from screen time for Lent. Wish me luck. :thumbsup:
Ditka’s dictaphone
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5545
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
Has thanked: 1266 times
Been thanked: 1313 times

Fields had one passing attempt against the Browns and 3 rushing attempts

Nice of the Browns to win - tank is on :D
Taking a break from screen time for Lent. Wish me luck. :thumbsup:
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9761
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 715 times
Been thanked: 871 times

Ditka’s dictaphone wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 5:22 pm Is the target 51% or 50.1%?
I Thought it's 50.1% - but I think I'm wrong

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/397 ... ell-wilson

They use 51% here
User avatar
Shadow
MVP
Posts: 1023
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2022 11:47 am
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 248 times

From a press release.
* Back in March, Fields was sent over to Pittsburgh in exchange for a 2025 sixth-round pick that could move up to a fourth pick if Fields played in 51% of their snaps.
Bears are actually dating the Prom Queen, who would have thought it?
What alternate universe is this?
Did I fall down the wrong trouser leg of time?
:banana: :headbang: :applaud:
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15163
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 2098 times
Been thanked: 3587 times

Yea we need an injury there or we are screwed
User avatar
Otis Day
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8645
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Armpit of IL.
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 536 times

Russ is cooking! Good line there in Pittsburgh, going to make it hard for a injury induced by a sack.
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15163
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 2098 times
Been thanked: 3587 times

Otis Day wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:27 am Russ is cooking! Good line there in Pittsburgh, going to make it hard for a injury induced by a sack.
They keep talking about their rookie C like he's the next great C in Steelers long history of great C's. It makes me sick every time I hear it. As much as I love Caleb, I still think that we're in better shape had we:

1. Traded down for a haul and kept Justin as our QB
2. Targeted Verse and Frazier, while still drafting Odunze. (Note, this is not pure hindsight, this was discussed prior to the draft as the plan for the trade down)
3. Not signed Keenan Allen and signed another DL or OL instead (DJ Reader + one of the higher paid G's)
4. Fired Flus and Hired Harbaugh

If this was Poles plan, we'd be 8-4 minimum right now.
User avatar
Arkansasbear
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6056
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
Has thanked: 616 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

dplank wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:33 am
Otis Day wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:27 am Russ is cooking! Good line there in Pittsburgh, going to make it hard for a injury induced by a sack.
They keep talking about their rookie C like he's the next great C in Steelers long history of great C's. It makes me sick every time I hear it. As much as I love Caleb, I still think that we're in better shape had we:

1. Traded down for a haul and kept Justin as our QB
2. Targeted Verse and Frazier, while still drafting Odunze. (Note, this is not pure hindsight, this was discussed prior to the draft as the plan for the trade down)
3. Not signed Keenan Allen and signed another DL or OL instead (DJ Reader + one of the higher paid G's)
4. Fired Flus and Hired Harbaugh

If this was Poles plan, we'd be 8-4 minimum right now.
As much as I love Fields, I don't know how we'd be doing him as our QB.
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15163
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 2098 times
Been thanked: 3587 times

We went 5-2 down the stretch with him last year, and he started 4-2 with Pittsburgh. So it feel counterintuitive to think he wouldn’t be winning here had he stayed and we made these moves.
User avatar
LacertineForest
Head Coach
Posts: 2258
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Has thanked: 3321 times
Been thanked: 574 times

dplank wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:33 am
Otis Day wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:27 am Russ is cooking! Good line there in Pittsburgh, going to make it hard for a injury induced by a sack.
They keep talking about their rookie C like he's the next great C in Steelers long history of great C's. It makes me sick every time I hear it. As much as I love Caleb, I still think that we're in better shape had we:

1. Traded down for a haul and kept Justin as our QB
2. Targeted Verse and Frazier, while still drafting Odunze. (Note, this is not pure hindsight, this was discussed prior to the draft as the plan for the trade down)
3. Not signed Keenan Allen and signed another DL or OL instead (DJ Reader + one of the higher paid G's)
4. Fired Flus and Hired Harbaugh

If this was Poles plan, we'd be 8-4 minimum right now.
Just #4 would have gotten us to 8-4 right now. Your plan gets you wins, but do you really think Fields is good enough to beat the defenses in this division alone, let alone win you playoff games? There's a reason Russ won the starting job in Pittsburgh.
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15163
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 2098 times
Been thanked: 3587 times

LacertineForest wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 11:44 am
dplank wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:33 am

They keep talking about their rookie C like he's the next great C in Steelers long history of great C's. It makes me sick every time I hear it. As much as I love Caleb, I still think that we're in better shape had we:

1. Traded down for a haul and kept Justin as our QB
2. Targeted Verse and Frazier, while still drafting Odunze. (Note, this is not pure hindsight, this was discussed prior to the draft as the plan for the trade down)
3. Not signed Keenan Allen and signed another DL or OL instead (DJ Reader + one of the higher paid G's)
4. Fired Flus and Hired Harbaugh

If this was Poles plan, we'd be 8-4 minimum right now.
Just #4 would have gotten us to 8-4 right now. Your plan gets you wins, but do you really think Fields is good enough to beat the defenses in this division alone, let alone win you playoff games? There's a reason Russ won the starting job in Pittsburgh.
I don't know and that's the rub here. I really really like what I see in Caleb, and long term that may turn out to be the better play. I'm just lamenting this season in particular - as for how it all pans out, only time will tell.
User avatar
LacertineForest
Head Coach
Posts: 2258
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Has thanked: 3321 times
Been thanked: 574 times

dplank wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 11:52 am
LacertineForest wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 11:44 am

Just #4 would have gotten us to 8-4 right now. Your plan gets you wins, but do you really think Fields is good enough to beat the defenses in this division alone, let alone win you playoff games? There's a reason Russ won the starting job in Pittsburgh.
I don't know and that's the rub here. I really really like what I see in Caleb, and long term that may turn out to be the better play. I'm just lamenting this season in particular - as for how it all pans out, only time will tell.
That's totally fair. We all had high hopes and it's just been a disaster, for the most part. At least Caleb has looked like the goods, and I think we got a good one in Rome, as well. Can you imagine how it would feel if Caleb looked like '23 Bryce Young out there? :sick:
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 4503
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 1058 times
Been thanked: 886 times

As someone who was a Fields guy, who loved Frazier in the draft last year, who was pretty high on Verse, and was uncertain about Williams: I'm glad I wasn't in charge.

Williams is so much better as a rookie QB than Fields is as a Y4 QB that there's no way trading Williams away was the move to make.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
Arkansasbear
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6056
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
Has thanked: 616 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

LacertineForest wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 11:44 am
dplank wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:33 am

They keep talking about their rookie C like he's the next great C in Steelers long history of great C's. It makes me sick every time I hear it. As much as I love Caleb, I still think that we're in better shape had we:

1. Traded down for a haul and kept Justin as our QB
2. Targeted Verse and Frazier, while still drafting Odunze. (Note, this is not pure hindsight, this was discussed prior to the draft as the plan for the trade down)
3. Not signed Keenan Allen and signed another DL or OL instead (DJ Reader + one of the higher paid G's)
4. Fired Flus and Hired Harbaugh

If this was Poles plan, we'd be 8-4 minimum right now.
Just #4 would have gotten us to 8-4 right now. Your plan gets you wins, but do you really think Fields is good enough to beat the defenses in this division alone, let alone win you playoff games? There's a reason Russ won the starting job in Pittsburgh.
If we had fired Flus and hired Johnson, I think that would have solves all our problems. We are in the hunt to win the division and practically have a playoff spot locked up.
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9761
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 715 times
Been thanked: 871 times

We still are wanting Fields??!?
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9761
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 715 times
Been thanked: 871 times

How much evidence is needed exactly

Just curious
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8359
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 906 times
Been thanked: 1784 times

RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9761
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 715 times
Been thanked: 871 times

dplank wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 11:36 am We went 5-2 down the stretch with him last year, and he started 4-2 with Pittsburgh. So it feel counterintuitive to think he wouldn’t be winning here had he stayed and we made these moves.
Would we need to admit Flus did a good job with the Defense then?

In Pitt - They didn't win a game with him where the Defense let up more points than the 1985 Bears gave up per Game. And Fields was averaging 1 Fumble a Game (Games started)

And the best candidate went here in large part due to Caleb not Fields. Fields IS a Free Agent folks....if Ben Johnson wanted him, he could have him - and frankly at a very reasonable price (basically just take a Marcus Mariotta contract cross out that name - Add Fields - Done and Done)

You can just be wrong...it's ok.
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9761
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 715 times
Been thanked: 871 times

I do love the TOMLIN IS SO HIGH ON FIELDS!!! stuff....was there like a different Head Coach not starting him?

Was it Omar Epps benching Fields and now Tomlin is pissed????
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 32164
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 3378 times

I’m tired of this thread.
Locked