OK so apparently I got banned for something(?) and I have a guess as to what even though the guy I was arguing with has had two different signatures that effectively trolled me for who knows how long and I never complained about it.
Anyway….
This is an important thing to know about when you’re banned and a great reason to “behave” in the first place….
I have Rich on Ignore. The problem though is that when I was banned I couldn’t log in. When I couldn’t log in the Ignore feature doesn’t work.
When I lurked here I had to scroll through his ad hominem musings and it was brutal.
If I had been told that up front I would’ve tighten the screws on myself and stuck to just saying how wonderful I think everything is.
In my time in the wilderness I have done the following:
1) I still believe that Eberflus should be fired.
2) We need to acquire a young pass rusher via trade.
3) I “beat Medicare”.
My Experience In The Void: A Disturbing Aspect Of Being Banned & Other Things
Moderator: wab
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
- Ditka’s dictaphone
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4340
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
- Has thanked: 920 times
- Been thanked: 976 times
Welcome back mate
(26/09/2023) Winner of the inaugural
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 496 times
- Been thanked: 934 times
Say what?
Are you having your head cut off and frozen when you turn 65?
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
- UOK
- Site Admin
- Posts: 25490
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Champaign, IL
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 1100 times
You got banned because you're always in the middle of this shit lately.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2024 11:10 am OK so apparently I got banned for something(?) and I have a guess as to what even though the guy I was arguing with has had two different signatures that effectively trolled me for who knows how long and I never complained about it.
You and G08 and whoever else that constantly churns notifications and bitching in my inbox. None of you report anything, you just go after each other in the pettiest and lamest ways. You guys can claim to be adults and feel like you need to be alphas or some bullshit when trying to attack the other, but you're forgetting two things:
1. this is an internet message board for Chicago Bears fans
2. my, and likely others, opinions of you who behave like this is not so much unimpressed as it is tiresome
If I discipline you guys like I did, then you were a victim to the other. If I don't discipline one the same as the other, then *I* am the bad guy.
This is the lowest stakes crap ever and you guys are all so damn good about talking about the Bears and keeping things cool that it boggles my mind why any of you get hung up on this stupid 'board rivalry' stuff. Who gives a shit?
Should I just ignore it now? Should I have an anonymous poll to see who all I should ban for the sake of the community? Should I talk to Xee and just shut this down because keeping up with you guys is such a waste of our time?
I am entirely open to suggestions as to how to make this board better. If it means bans, or less moderation, or anything really, I'm open to hearing it. Get it all out there. Rich, TMP, G08, whoever else I'm forgetting who is constantly up each other's asses and mine because adults on the internet can't break one another's balls without making it a holy war.
- UOK
- Site Admin
- Posts: 25490
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Champaign, IL
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 1100 times
@Xee @wab Feel free to opine.
I've lifted G08's 24hr suspension so that he can be a part of this discussion.
I've lifted G08's 24hr suspension so that he can be a part of this discussion.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 21019
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 925 times
Dad's mad -- and he should be.UOK wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 8:51 amYou got banned because you're always in the middle of this shit lately.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2024 11:10 am OK so apparently I got banned for something(?) and I have a guess as to what even though the guy I was arguing with has had two different signatures that effectively trolled me for who knows how long and I never complained about it.
You and G08 and whoever else that constantly churns notifications and bitching in my inbox. None of you report anything, you just go after each other in the pettiest and lamest ways. You guys can claim to be adults and feel like you need to be alphas or some bullshit when trying to attack the other, but you're forgetting two things:
1. this is an internet message board for Chicago Bears fans
2. my, and likely others, opinions of you who behave like this is not so much unimpressed as it is tiresome
If I discipline you guys like I did, then you were a victim to the other. If I don't discipline one the same as the other, then *I* am the bad guy.
This is the lowest stakes crap ever and you guys are all so damn good about talking about the Bears and keeping things cool that it boggles my mind why any of you get hung up on this stupid 'board rivalry' stuff. Who gives a shit?
Should I just ignore it now? Should I have an anonymous poll to see who all I should ban for the sake of the community? Should I talk to Xee and just shut this down because keeping up with you guys is such a waste of our time?
I am entirely open to suggestions as to how to make this board better. If it means bans, or less moderation, or anything really, I'm open to hearing it. Get it all out there. Rich, TMP, G08, whoever else I'm forgetting who is constantly up each other's asses and mine because adults on the internet can't break one another's balls without making it a holy war.
Being as transparent as I can:
I mentioned it in another thread; if or when he feels the need to respond to Bears-related posts of mine (or others) with shit-talking, I'm going to call him out on it. That won't change so hopefully he'll get better. If not, well that's your call as the owner/moderator.
I'm a man and can admit I need to get better as well, and I will. I mean it's a Chicago Bears message board after all, like you said. We're here to talk ball, discuss different opinions on players, etc. For the record: I did not create this "Fields vs. Williams" nonsense and reference it every chance I get. I did certainly respond to the antagonism though after attempts at having a civil discussion were met with more buffoonery. (recall other posters discussing how I brought "receipts").
I don't report messages or whine to mods about people being mean because that's not how I roll. Clearly, other people do roll that way, as evidenced by what I had written about my sig being removed. To each his own I suppose; I can certainly see how that is annoying and tiresome as an owner/moderator and feel bad for any role I played in it.
Anyway, I am hoping everyone's behavior -- myself included -- improves or as the owner/moderator of this board you permanently ban who you need to ban. If you keep getting complaints regarding the same person over-and-over-and-over from different people, well, that should tell you something.
Sorry for the bullshit @UOK, I've known you since the WWM days (2003?) and I consider a lot of you guys dear friends.
That's it for me in this thread, I'll see most of you around in Halas Hall and some of the other forums
“Here we go. Here we go. Let’s focus. Let’s get after it.”
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 30573
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 162 times
- Been thanked: 2359 times
This entire post is why it's a problem. You could have just come back and started talking Bears, but no. And here we are again.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2024 11:10 am OK so apparently I got banned for something(?) and I have a guess as to what even though the guy I was arguing with has had two different signatures that effectively trolled me for who knows how long and I never complained about it.
Anyway….
This is an important thing to know about when you’re banned and a great reason to “behave” in the first place….
I have Rich on Ignore. The problem though is that when I was banned I couldn’t log in. When I couldn’t log in the Ignore feature doesn’t work.
When I lurked here I had to scroll through his ad hominem musings and it was brutal.
If I had been told that up front I would’ve tighten the screws on myself and stuck to just saying how wonderful I think everything is.
In my time in the wilderness I have done the following:
1) I still believe that Eberflus should be fired.
2) We need to acquire a young pass rusher via trade.
3) I “beat Medicare”.
I don't want anyone banned. None of what anyone is doing is truly a bannable offense, but it's absolutely annoying as hell.
- Arkansasbear
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5573
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 574 times
- Been thanked: 919 times
Listen we don't say it enough, but thanks to the mods for all they do. I wouldn't want that freaking job. IMO, I think you do a great job. I appreciate you show some grace and maybe let things go a bit further than some would like. But typically by doing that I think the "bad actors" get out what they need to on THAT topic and move on. Now granted it pops up somewhere else. I don't really keep track of who started what or who said what. I come here to get information about the Bears. I read most posts without even looking at who posted it. When it turns into the mindless back and forth I start looking at who is posting and try to skip over the crap.UOK wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 8:51 amYou got banned because you're always in the middle of this shit lately.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2024 11:10 am OK so apparently I got banned for something(?) and I have a guess as to what even though the guy I was arguing with has had two different signatures that effectively trolled me for who knows how long and I never complained about it.
You and G08 and whoever else that constantly churns notifications and bitching in my inbox. None of you report anything, you just go after each other in the pettiest and lamest ways. You guys can claim to be adults and feel like you need to be alphas or some bullshit when trying to attack the other, but you're forgetting two things:
1. this is an internet message board for Chicago Bears fans
2. my, and likely others, opinions of you who behave like this is not so much unimpressed as it is tiresome
If I discipline you guys like I did, then you were a victim to the other. If I don't discipline one the same as the other, then *I* am the bad guy.
This is the lowest stakes crap ever and you guys are all so damn good about talking about the Bears and keeping things cool that it boggles my mind why any of you get hung up on this stupid 'board rivalry' stuff. Who gives a shit?
Should I just ignore it now? Should I have an anonymous poll to see who all I should ban for the sake of the community? Should I talk to Xee and just shut this down because keeping up with you guys is such a waste of our time?
I am entirely open to suggestions as to how to make this board better. If it means bans, or less moderation, or anything really, I'm open to hearing it. Get it all out there. Rich, TMP, G08, whoever else I'm forgetting who is constantly up each other's asses and mine because adults on the internet can't break one another's balls without making it a holy war.
All I do all day is listen to people lie, say crap and bitch and moan trying to turn ant hills into mountains. So I've got a good filter to get through all that.
I don't see an need to increase bans or let it become the wild wild west. Keep it as is should work, but if you and Xee think you want to run it differently so be it. The only option I am opposed to is the nuclear one - shutting it down. But if it happens I get it. No good deed ever goes unpunished. Running this place for free is your good deed and having to moderate the people is your punishment.
Perhaps we could try some sort of alternative sanctions. When the twins where young my wife was working as a criminal investigator handling sex crimes. They would go after each other none stop some times. So one day I walked out to my wife's police car, grabbed the handcuffs off the gear shifter and handcuffed the twins together and told them once they figured out how not to be holy terrors I'd unhook them. After about 5 minutes it stopped and never happened again.
Perhaps should could ban the offenders and keep the ban in place until they watched a Bears game together while handcuffed.
- Arkansasbear
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5573
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 574 times
- Been thanked: 919 times
P.S. once again sorry for being a smart ass. But it is my love language.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
The second I argue with you about this, and there is A LOT to rebut here, I’ll get the ban hammer again.wab wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:23 amThis entire post is why it's a problem. You could have just come back and started talking Bears, but no. And here we are again.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2024 11:10 am OK so apparently I got banned for something(?) and I have a guess as to what even though the guy I was arguing with has had two different signatures that effectively trolled me for who knows how long and I never complained about it.
Anyway….
This is an important thing to know about when you’re banned and a great reason to “behave” in the first place….
I have Rich on Ignore. The problem though is that when I was banned I couldn’t log in. When I couldn’t log in the Ignore feature doesn’t work.
When I lurked here I had to scroll through his ad hominem musings and it was brutal.
If I had been told that up front I would’ve tighten the screws on myself and stuck to just saying how wonderful I think everything is.
In my time in the wilderness I have done the following:
1) I still believe that Eberflus should be fired.
2) We need to acquire a young pass rusher via trade.
3) I “beat Medicare”.
I don't want anyone banned. None of what anyone is doing is truly a bannable offense, but it's absolutely annoying as hell.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 30573
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 162 times
- Been thanked: 2359 times
You are free and clear to give your rebuttal.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:32 amThe second I argue with you about this, and there is A LOT to rebut here, I’ll get the ban hammer again.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
Your hypocrisy is fucking awful and quite obvious and it’s been going on for years.wab wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:35 amYou are free and clear to give your rebuttal.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:32 am
The second I argue with you about this, and there is A LOT to rebut here, I’ll get the ban hammer again.
You have tolerated Rich’s bullshit around here for years without so much as a slap on the wrist and he’s done worse stuff than I’ve even ever thought. While I was banned just this past week I had to see his shit. Hounding plank across multiple threads repeatedly and absolute silence from a discipline perspective.
Yeah I’m “sorry” (not really) that I hounded your boy G08 (who apparently is perfect in every way because you NEVER call him out on anything related to this) and called out the LARPing and argued with him about how somebody could flip flop from Discord to the board.
G08 does a great job of flopping to the point where he makes LeBron look like a tough guy by comparison. He cries and plays the role of victim all the while having multiple signatures that effectively trolled me for months.
Where was your sense of duty then? It was absent and it’s because you people are a clique.
Even now, he acts like a victim as if he never had anything to say to me.
Did I whine? Did I cry for mommy? Nope.
But here we go, even in this thread he’s doing his flopping.
UOK was supposed to ban his ass for yet ANOTHER troll job on the sig and it got lifted in like five minutes.
How in the hell is that fair?
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 30573
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 162 times
- Been thanked: 2359 times
That sounds like a question for UOK really. But the fact that you are still a member here after the things you pulled two years ago should speak to our lack of hypocrisy.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:47 amYour hypocrisy is fucking awful and quite obvious and it’s been going on for years.
You have tolerated Rich’s bullshit around here for years without so much as a slap on the wrist and he’s done worse stuff than I’ve even ever thought. While I was banned just this past week I had to see his shit. Hounding plank across multiple threads repeatedly and absolute silence from a discipline perspective.
Yeah I’m “sorry” (not really) that I hounded your boy G08 (who apparently is perfect in every way because you NEVER call him out on anything related to this) and called out the LARPing and argued with him about how somebody could flip flop from Discord to the board.
G08 does a great job of flopping to the point where he makes LeBron look like a tough guy by comparison. He cries and plays the role of victim all the while having multiple signatures that effectively trolled me for months.
Where was your sense of duty then? It was absent and it’s because you people are a clique.
Even now, he acts like a victim as if he never had anything to say to me.
Did I whine? Did I cry for mommy? Nope.
But here we go, even in this thread he’s doing his flopping.
UOK was supposed to ban his ass for yet ANOTHER troll job on the sig and it got lifted in like five minutes.
How in the hell is that fair?
- UOK
- Site Admin
- Posts: 25490
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Champaign, IL
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 1100 times
1. You and G08 have both accused me/wab of hypocrisy, so you guys are maybe more alike than you'd think.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:47 amYour hypocrisy is fucking awful and quite obvious and it’s been going on for years.
You have tolerated Rich’s bullshit around here for years without so much as a slap on the wrist and he’s done worse stuff than I’ve even ever thought. While I was banned just this past week I had to see his shit. Hounding plank across multiple threads repeatedly and absolute silence from a discipline perspective.
Yeah I’m “sorry” (not really) that I hounded your boy G08 (who apparently is perfect in every way because you NEVER call him out on anything related to this) and called out the LARPing and argued with him about how somebody could flip flop from Discord to the board.
G08 does a great job of flopping to the point where he makes LeBron look like a tough guy by comparison. He cries and plays the role of victim all the while having multiple signatures that effectively trolled me for months.
Where was your sense of duty then? It was absent and it’s because you people are a clique.
Even now, he acts like a victim as if he never had anything to say to me.
Did I whine? Did I cry for mommy? Nope.
But here we go, even in this thread he’s doing his flopping.
UOK was supposed to ban his ass for yet ANOTHER troll job on the sig and it got lifted in like five minutes.
How in the hell is that fair?
2. I constantly look for what qualifies Rich as an antognist and I just don't see it. Nobody reports anything. Those who do don't provide me with any sort of argument and I'd love for @RichH55 to get in his two cents here. Same with @dplank . Let's all have a roundtable here.
3. G08 and us admittedly go way back, and believe me, there are a lot of things about the way he posts that I find extremely obnoxious. There's no "but" coming; he's been a fartknocker for years and will almost certainly continue to be, but he, like almost all of the "usual suspects" around here, has a good heart and if you ignore the assholery is a well-meaning type. I have no idea why he, and others here on occasion, feel the compulsion to be dicks on a little message board for whom the entire creation is centered around communal agreement that the Bears are our favorite team.
4. TMP, G08, and Plank are all the exact same when it comes to this flopping/whining crap. You get a slap on the wrist from me, and suddenly it's personal and not your fault and how come this and why that and so on. You all are hyper-sensitive people to, again, and I can't say this enough, the lowest stakes of all time. This is a really tight and small community that has no reason to ever have a thread like this, but here we are, and maybe it's healthy.
5. I did ban G08 but he reached out to me privately on another platform and I gave him a piece of my mind there. However, once this thread was pointed out to me I decided it was better for him to be able to participate in this so we can get some closure.
6. I'm not going to ban or suspend anyone from their comments in this thread for the time being, so long as no major "too far" personal attacks are employed.
7. I need to really emphasize to those who would break wab and I's balls about hypocrisy. Xee, wab, and myself aren't able to police the boards thoroughly at all times and shouldn't have to. I check the page many times a day and try to catch as much as I can, but there's always going to be threads and discussions that go off.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
Exactly.wab wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:53 amThat sounds like a question for UOK really. But the fact that you are still a member here after the things you pulled two years ago should speak to our lack of hypocrisy.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:47 am
Your hypocrisy is fucking awful and quite obvious and it’s been going on for years.
You have tolerated Rich’s bullshit around here for years without so much as a slap on the wrist and he’s done worse stuff than I’ve even ever thought. While I was banned just this past week I had to see his shit. Hounding plank across multiple threads repeatedly and absolute silence from a discipline perspective.
Yeah I’m “sorry” (not really) that I hounded your boy G08 (who apparently is perfect in every way because you NEVER call him out on anything related to this) and called out the LARPing and argued with him about how somebody could flip flop from Discord to the board.
G08 does a great job of flopping to the point where he makes LeBron look like a tough guy by comparison. He cries and plays the role of victim all the while having multiple signatures that effectively trolled me for months.
Where was your sense of duty then? It was absent and it’s because you people are a clique.
Even now, he acts like a victim as if he never had anything to say to me.
Did I whine? Did I cry for mommy? Nope.
But here we go, even in this thread he’s doing his flopping.
UOK was supposed to ban his ass for yet ANOTHER troll job on the sig and it got lifted in like five minutes.
How in the hell is that fair?
When confronted with your bullshit you hide and try and pawn it off on UOK.
lol you’re more with whatever happened two years ago (Whatever that is.) than you are with relevant things.
You also just admitted your bias.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
I never complained that you(?) banned me. I made this thread people who know me probably saw this as humorous. You could also tell from other posts since then I’m taking a lighthearted approach to the banning. I’m not flopping like G08 playing the perpetual victim.UOK wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 10:04 am1. You and G08 have both accused me/wab of hypocrisy, so you guys are maybe more alike than you'd think.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:47 am
Your hypocrisy is fucking awful and quite obvious and it’s been going on for years.
You have tolerated Rich’s bullshit around here for years without so much as a slap on the wrist and he’s done worse stuff than I’ve even ever thought. While I was banned just this past week I had to see his shit. Hounding plank across multiple threads repeatedly and absolute silence from a discipline perspective.
Yeah I’m “sorry” (not really) that I hounded your boy G08 (who apparently is perfect in every way because you NEVER call him out on anything related to this) and called out the LARPing and argued with him about how somebody could flip flop from Discord to the board.
G08 does a great job of flopping to the point where he makes LeBron look like a tough guy by comparison. He cries and plays the role of victim all the while having multiple signatures that effectively trolled me for months.
Where was your sense of duty then? It was absent and it’s because you people are a clique.
Even now, he acts like a victim as if he never had anything to say to me.
Did I whine? Did I cry for mommy? Nope.
But here we go, even in this thread he’s doing his flopping.
UOK was supposed to ban his ass for yet ANOTHER troll job on the sig and it got lifted in like five minutes.
How in the hell is that fair?
2. I constantly look for what qualifies Rich as an antognist and I just don't see it. Nobody reports anything. Those who do don't provide me with any sort of argument and I'd love for @RichH55 to get in his two cents here. Same with @dplank . Let's all have a roundtable here.
3. G08 and us admittedly go way back, and believe me, there are a lot of things about the way he posts that I find extremely obnoxious. There's no "but" coming; he's been a fartknocker for years and will almost certainly continue to be, but he, like almost all of the "usual suspects" around here, has a good heart and if you ignore the assholery is a well-meaning type. I have no idea why he, and others here on occasion, feel the compulsion to be dicks on a little message board for whom the entire creation is centered around communal agreement that the Bears are our favorite team.
4. TMP, G08, and Plank are all the exact same when it comes to this flopping/whining crap. You get a slap on the wrist from me, and suddenly it's personal and not your fault and how come this and why that and so on. You all are hyper-sensitive people to, again, and I can't say this enough, the lowest stakes of all time. This is a really tight and small community that has no reason to ever have a thread like this, but here we are, and maybe it's healthy.
5. I did ban G08 but he reached out to me privately on another platform and I gave him a piece of my mind there. However, once this thread was pointed out to me I decided it was better for him to be able to participate in this so we can get some closure.
6. I'm not going to ban or suspend anyone from their comments in this thread for the time being, so long as no major "too far" personal attacks are employed.
7. I need to really emphasize to those who would break wab and I's balls about hypocrisy. Xee, wab, and myself aren't able to police the boards thoroughly at all times and shouldn't have to. I check the page many times a day and try to catch as much as I can, but there's always going to be threads and discussions that go off.
In terms of G08, I just want him to STFU. He doesn’t even have to admit to the LARPing and dishonesty. His behavior since then has validated that for me on its own. I’m good there. But I do think you need to take a look at him and Rich.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 21019
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 925 times
I see my name being mentioned..
What purpose does it serve, in the original post of the thread he created, to shit-talk @RichH55? Or routinely taking the time to screenshot, upload and share an image of showing posts of Rich being on ignore?
Seriously, what purpose other than to be an antagonistic dick?
That's who this person is, but then he plays the beta card and pisses and moans and whines and reports messages and complains that he's a victim when he gets a taste of his own medicine.
I definitely get into it with some people, especially when I have a strong opinion on the subject matter, but I don't routinely run into random threads and start shit or randomly bring up people to shit talk them. That's a level of psychoses, for real-for real.
Keep an eye out moving forward, it'll be veiled insults or random mentions of something irrelevant to a thread/topic. Dude can't help himself (see Rich reference above).
I'll lastly argue until I'm blue in the face that I have a good if not great relationship with the vast majority of this board, he can't do the same. I also never have been banned for multiple months either, for fuck's sake
This part might be hard for you: keep me or any suggestion of me out of your mouth and we're good. I've said this already but you just can't seem to adhere to it, and so I have to check you and then you throw a hissy fit and here we are.
Enough already. Watch, I'll go first:
Here's all you need to know, @UOKThe Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2024 11:10 am OK so apparently I got banned for something(?) and I have a guess as to what even though the guy I was arguing with has had two different signatures that effectively trolled me for who knows how long and I never complained about it.
Anyway….
This is an important thing to know about when you’re banned and a great reason to “behave” in the first place….
I have Rich on Ignore. The problem though is that when I was banned I couldn’t log in. When I couldn’t log in the Ignore feature doesn’t work.
When I lurked here I had to scroll through his ad hominem musings and it was brutal.
If I had been told that up front I would’ve tighten the screws on myself and stuck to just saying how wonderful I think everything is.
In my time in the wilderness I have done the following:
1) I still believe that Eberflus should be fired.
2) We need to acquire a young pass rusher via trade.
3) I “beat Medicare”.
What purpose does it serve, in the original post of the thread he created, to shit-talk @RichH55? Or routinely taking the time to screenshot, upload and share an image of showing posts of Rich being on ignore?
Seriously, what purpose other than to be an antagonistic dick?
That's who this person is, but then he plays the beta card and pisses and moans and whines and reports messages and complains that he's a victim when he gets a taste of his own medicine.
I definitely get into it with some people, especially when I have a strong opinion on the subject matter, but I don't routinely run into random threads and start shit or randomly bring up people to shit talk them. That's a level of psychoses, for real-for real.
Keep an eye out moving forward, it'll be veiled insults or random mentions of something irrelevant to a thread/topic. Dude can't help himself (see Rich reference above).
I'll lastly argue until I'm blue in the face that I have a good if not great relationship with the vast majority of this board, he can't do the same. I also never have been banned for multiple months either, for fuck's sake
Dude, for last time, I have no idea what LARPing is or what your obsession is with it -- but honestly it's getting weird. You can feel free to validate whatever you want in that mind of yours, go nuts.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 10:58 am In terms of G08, I just want him to STFU. He doesn’t even have to admit to the LARPing and dishonesty. His behavior since then has validated that for me on its own. I’m good there. But I do think you need to take a look at him and Rich.
This part might be hard for you: keep me or any suggestion of me out of your mouth and we're good. I've said this already but you just can't seem to adhere to it, and so I have to check you and then you throw a hissy fit and here we are.
Enough already. Watch, I'll go first:
“Here we go. Here we go. Let’s focus. Let’s get after it.”
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
LOL says the guy who contacts UOK on the side to get out of a ban.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 30573
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 162 times
- Been thanked: 2359 times
If it’s not abundantly clear by now, I have nothing to do with bans or suspensions.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 10:55 amExactly.
When confronted with your bullshit you hide and try and pawn it off on UOK.
lol you’re more with whatever happened two years ago (Whatever that is.) than you are with relevant things.
You also just admitted your bias.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
Another dodge.wab wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 12:17 pmIf it’s not abundantly clear by now, I have nothing to do with bans or suspensions.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 10:55 am
Exactly.
When confronted with your bullshit you hide and try and pawn it off on UOK.
lol you’re more with whatever happened two years ago (Whatever that is.) than you are with relevant things.
You also just admitted your bias.
Hey can I have yours or UOK’s MySpace profile so I can DM you people when I get banned too or is that just for people who are in the club like your buddy G08?
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 21019
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 925 times
I see I'm being mentioned again...
(seems like you whined about me saying "whining enough can get your sig removed by mods"... I'm sensing a theme)
I said alright, well then be consistent, all antagonism should be banned, right? Like The Marshall Plan's shit-talking of @RichH55 for no reason in a thread he created, for example.
Pretty straight-forward stuff. Seems like you don't like being held to similar standards and then proceed to throw hissy fits.
Actually, all I asked was for what reason was I banned; he said antagonism.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 12:03 pm LOL says the guy who contacts UOK on the side to get out of a ban.
(seems like you whined about me saying "whining enough can get your sig removed by mods"... I'm sensing a theme)
I said alright, well then be consistent, all antagonism should be banned, right? Like The Marshall Plan's shit-talking of @RichH55 for no reason in a thread he created, for example.
Pretty straight-forward stuff. Seems like you don't like being held to similar standards and then proceed to throw hissy fits.
“Here we go. Here we go. Let’s focus. Let’s get after it.”
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 30573
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 162 times
- Been thanked: 2359 times
It’s not a dodge. I don’t know how clearly I can spell it out, but UOK decides who’s banned and for how long. We give input but it’s up to him. Thats how this works.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 12:31 pmAnother dodge.
Hey can I have yours or UOK’s MySpace profile so I can DM you people when I get banned too or is that just for people who are in the club like your buddy G08?
You have an issue with me and UOK because we go way back with G08, even though he’s also been suspended multiple times.
You have an issue with me and UOK because you believe we give Rich special treatment, even though UOK says with specificity above that he’s not seeing Rich do anything wrong. You’ve even gone so far as to concoct some conspiracy theory that Rich is my alt. That’s weird.
And you won’t engage UOK directly - you always do it through responses to me - because you ultimately know your fate is in his hands.
And just so I’m completely transparent, in spite of everything, I have zero issues with you being a member of this board. You have some really valuable insights when it comes to pure football discussions.
- Arkansasbear
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5573
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 574 times
- Been thanked: 919 times
I personally like the contributions all you guys make - I'll throw in Rich and dplank as well. I think you all drop good insight and opinions. For whatever reasons everyone seems to want to defend their position over and over and over again and then it breaks down into drivel.
Don't get me wrong, at times I will double down and triple down on things when I shouldn't. It does seem I do that most with Rich for some reason. Don't hate Rich over it, he using his "inner attorney" to come after the judge. He'll learn someday the judge is always right (at least until some appeals court says otherwise). (see the emoji is a sign I'm joking around, something that sometimes gets lost in places like these or text). But I know with Rich (and myself to a degree) that arguing and defending what has been said is like meth!!!! LET'S KEEP IT GOING!!!!!!!!!!! So I just make a practice to tell myself we are running in circles he can have the last word and move on.
I will be clear, no one, including Rich, has ever launched a personal attack on me or said things to me I found to be inappropriate. (other that someone said some other poster was the most optimistic one here and that struck a nerve ) Mostly because I simply make sure to end it before it can get that way. Just remind yourself we are all pulling for the same thing - to take over the world. No wait that's my Pinky and Brain chat room, we all want the Bears to take over the world.
I close with this - remember the movie Road House (the original, not the sequel that was okay). "Be nice." If they say your mom is a cocksucker ask yourself "Is she?" Then don't respond. I know you disagree about who the troll is, but if you think you aren't the troll just remember - the troll wants to be fed. If you don't respond to the troll, the troll sulks back into his cave with nothing to do.
Perfect example was Tuesday in court. I guy couldn't see is kids as he was being held in jail rape charges and there was a no contact order in the criminal case. I had the custody case and, against the advice of his attorney, decided he needed to testify and tell me how he was going to sue everyone involved in the matter, have federal charges brought against us and would own everything we had because he was innocent. I know some judges that would have lost their shit over that held him in contempt and "thrown the book at him." But I knew he was just trying to get me blow my cool. So I explained to him that he was free to appeal my ruling, I was happy to provide him the address for the judicial discipline committer to file a complaint if he thought I had done him wrong and would welcome defending a federal suit. Did it all in very calm manner and told him he could have a seat. He walked to his chair with a look of defeat and said something like, I guess I'm not mad at you judge and I expect he won't do anything in any further hearings. Had I let him goat me into blowing my cool and holding him in contempt (and what good is that going to - "Sir I'm giving you 90 days in jail!!!" Him - "Boy judge you sure are tough, I'm being held without bond and don't have hearing until December so I'll be there anyway.") I think it would have gotten worse that day and down the road.
Don't get me wrong, at times I will double down and triple down on things when I shouldn't. It does seem I do that most with Rich for some reason. Don't hate Rich over it, he using his "inner attorney" to come after the judge. He'll learn someday the judge is always right (at least until some appeals court says otherwise). (see the emoji is a sign I'm joking around, something that sometimes gets lost in places like these or text). But I know with Rich (and myself to a degree) that arguing and defending what has been said is like meth!!!! LET'S KEEP IT GOING!!!!!!!!!!! So I just make a practice to tell myself we are running in circles he can have the last word and move on.
I will be clear, no one, including Rich, has ever launched a personal attack on me or said things to me I found to be inappropriate. (other that someone said some other poster was the most optimistic one here and that struck a nerve ) Mostly because I simply make sure to end it before it can get that way. Just remind yourself we are all pulling for the same thing - to take over the world. No wait that's my Pinky and Brain chat room, we all want the Bears to take over the world.
I close with this - remember the movie Road House (the original, not the sequel that was okay). "Be nice." If they say your mom is a cocksucker ask yourself "Is she?" Then don't respond. I know you disagree about who the troll is, but if you think you aren't the troll just remember - the troll wants to be fed. If you don't respond to the troll, the troll sulks back into his cave with nothing to do.
Perfect example was Tuesday in court. I guy couldn't see is kids as he was being held in jail rape charges and there was a no contact order in the criminal case. I had the custody case and, against the advice of his attorney, decided he needed to testify and tell me how he was going to sue everyone involved in the matter, have federal charges brought against us and would own everything we had because he was innocent. I know some judges that would have lost their shit over that held him in contempt and "thrown the book at him." But I knew he was just trying to get me blow my cool. So I explained to him that he was free to appeal my ruling, I was happy to provide him the address for the judicial discipline committer to file a complaint if he thought I had done him wrong and would welcome defending a federal suit. Did it all in very calm manner and told him he could have a seat. He walked to his chair with a look of defeat and said something like, I guess I'm not mad at you judge and I expect he won't do anything in any further hearings. Had I let him goat me into blowing my cool and holding him in contempt (and what good is that going to - "Sir I'm giving you 90 days in jail!!!" Him - "Boy judge you sure are tough, I'm being held without bond and don't have hearing until December so I'll be there anyway.") I think it would have gotten worse that day and down the road.
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 13370
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 1563 times
- Been thanked: 2730 times
Well....I'll throw my thoughts in here since I was asked. I'll just warn in advance is multi layered and has some nuance to it, but here goes it:
1. Quick disclaimer: When I was suspended, I did not come back and whine about it. In fact, I said I deserved it and didn't hold any grudge about it.
2. I for a short time mod'd the old cbfanforum that many of us migrated from, so I understand that it's a shit job and I believe I have a special level of appreciation for the BS you guys endure for no pay. I only did that at cbfanforum because when the site went down for non-payment, I took it upon myself to find the hosting provider and pay the bill - it's not a role I ever wanted and I'm sure you really don't either.
3. @UOK - I'm honestly not sure how to have a reasonable conversation with you about this if you can't see how Rich is an antagonist. It would be like trying to argue with someone that thinks water isn't wet. As a board administrator, are you able to see how many board members have Rich on block vs anyone else on the board? I'm not asking you share the data, but maybe that will shed a light on it for you. If you like, and I could do this via PM so as not to junk things up any worse, send you in detail his last XX number of posts and explain why I and SEVERAL others see him as a major antagonist/shit stirrer.
4. I do not see why there is an aversion by the moderators to just step in and make a very simple demand when someone is obsessively mocking, snarking, deriding another poster. For example, I thought TMP was going after G08 too much recently and was hitting him across several threads unnecessarily - an easy fix to that would be a simple moderator message that isn't some vague "cut the crap" thing, but a very specific "Do not quote or attack this specific user again, or there will be a suspension" message. Both those guys are my friends so I really hated to see it happening.
5. Bringing that thought back to my nemisis, I've really tried to take the high road with Rich - and I did so for one reason, for the benefit of the board members as a whole who don't want to hear Rich and I argue about stuff ad nauseum. Has Rich ever walked away from an argument and taken the high road? Like, ever? I did, I simply stopped engaging with him to try and create peace on the board for everyone else's benefit. And what was my reward for this? Constantly being quoted, berated, mocked, words being twisted, over and over and over again across every thread. Again, how you don't see this is just remarkable to me, just fucking look man it's right there. I make a post, not addressing him in any way, and he feels absolutely COMPELLED to jump in and find some portion or part of what was said that he can take issue with, or twist around, and throw shade/snark my way. And what do I do about it? Take the high road, I see when people quote him back so I see his comments far more than I want to - and yet I just let it go. So in this particular regard, I believe you are not being a good moderator because you have two members behaving fundamentally differently but you're lumping them together as one.
6. So.....simple easy fix is sitting right there. Why not just tell Rich once and for all - do not quote dplank. This is low stakes right? What's so hard about that. We all know where it leads, and I have Rich on block and you can search all you like going back to the first of the year you're not going to see me instigating ANYTHING with him - it's ALWAYS him instigating. Always. And my question for you UOK is why you don't think that matters here? All we are talking about is decorum, manners and such. No one is getting upset of Bears arguments, people get upset when other people insult them and act like assholes. This is an easy fix, something I've asked for before, you can make one simple move but choose not to even though it's, as you say, super low stakes. Why? Why not just tell Rich, dude stop going after dplank or your gone. How hard is that for you, and how hard is that for Rich? I've done it on my own already - again - for the benefit of the other board members.
7. In this regard, I will argue until I'm out of oxygen that you have a double standard. I cannot engage in an argument with Rich or there's an immediate backlash from the entire board. So I say fine, I won't do that. But he's allowed to shit talk me every day without any consequence? That's just simply not right.
1. Quick disclaimer: When I was suspended, I did not come back and whine about it. In fact, I said I deserved it and didn't hold any grudge about it.
2. I for a short time mod'd the old cbfanforum that many of us migrated from, so I understand that it's a shit job and I believe I have a special level of appreciation for the BS you guys endure for no pay. I only did that at cbfanforum because when the site went down for non-payment, I took it upon myself to find the hosting provider and pay the bill - it's not a role I ever wanted and I'm sure you really don't either.
3. @UOK - I'm honestly not sure how to have a reasonable conversation with you about this if you can't see how Rich is an antagonist. It would be like trying to argue with someone that thinks water isn't wet. As a board administrator, are you able to see how many board members have Rich on block vs anyone else on the board? I'm not asking you share the data, but maybe that will shed a light on it for you. If you like, and I could do this via PM so as not to junk things up any worse, send you in detail his last XX number of posts and explain why I and SEVERAL others see him as a major antagonist/shit stirrer.
4. I do not see why there is an aversion by the moderators to just step in and make a very simple demand when someone is obsessively mocking, snarking, deriding another poster. For example, I thought TMP was going after G08 too much recently and was hitting him across several threads unnecessarily - an easy fix to that would be a simple moderator message that isn't some vague "cut the crap" thing, but a very specific "Do not quote or attack this specific user again, or there will be a suspension" message. Both those guys are my friends so I really hated to see it happening.
5. Bringing that thought back to my nemisis, I've really tried to take the high road with Rich - and I did so for one reason, for the benefit of the board members as a whole who don't want to hear Rich and I argue about stuff ad nauseum. Has Rich ever walked away from an argument and taken the high road? Like, ever? I did, I simply stopped engaging with him to try and create peace on the board for everyone else's benefit. And what was my reward for this? Constantly being quoted, berated, mocked, words being twisted, over and over and over again across every thread. Again, how you don't see this is just remarkable to me, just fucking look man it's right there. I make a post, not addressing him in any way, and he feels absolutely COMPELLED to jump in and find some portion or part of what was said that he can take issue with, or twist around, and throw shade/snark my way. And what do I do about it? Take the high road, I see when people quote him back so I see his comments far more than I want to - and yet I just let it go. So in this particular regard, I believe you are not being a good moderator because you have two members behaving fundamentally differently but you're lumping them together as one.
6. So.....simple easy fix is sitting right there. Why not just tell Rich once and for all - do not quote dplank. This is low stakes right? What's so hard about that. We all know where it leads, and I have Rich on block and you can search all you like going back to the first of the year you're not going to see me instigating ANYTHING with him - it's ALWAYS him instigating. Always. And my question for you UOK is why you don't think that matters here? All we are talking about is decorum, manners and such. No one is getting upset of Bears arguments, people get upset when other people insult them and act like assholes. This is an easy fix, something I've asked for before, you can make one simple move but choose not to even though it's, as you say, super low stakes. Why? Why not just tell Rich, dude stop going after dplank or your gone. How hard is that for you, and how hard is that for Rich? I've done it on my own already - again - for the benefit of the other board members.
7. In this regard, I will argue until I'm out of oxygen that you have a double standard. I cannot engage in an argument with Rich or there's an immediate backlash from the entire board. So I say fine, I won't do that. But he's allowed to shit talk me every day without any consequence? That's just simply not right.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
It’s no secret that I absolutely cannot stand you and this goes back years. This isn’t the first time you’ve shown a clear double standard to somebody in your clique.wab wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 12:58 pmIt’s not a dodge. I don’t know how clearly I can spell it out, but UOK decides who’s banned and for how long. We give input but it’s up to him. Thats how this works.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 12:31 pm
Another dodge.
Hey can I have yours or UOK’s MySpace profile so I can DM you people when I get banned too or is that just for people who are in the club like your buddy G08?
You have an issue with me and UOK because we go way back with G08, even though he’s also been suspended multiple times.
You have an issue with me and UOK because you believe we give Rich special treatment, even though UOK says with specificity above that he’s not seeing Rich do anything wrong. You’ve even gone so far as to concoct some conspiracy theory that Rich is my alt. That’s weird.
And you won’t engage UOK directly - you always do it through responses to me - because you ultimately know your fate is in his hands.
And just so I’m completely transparent, in spite of everything, I have zero issues with you being a member of this board. You have some really valuable insights when it comes to pure football discussions.
When I got back I reported G08’s sig to you based on the report closure from Wednesday afternoon? How come you didn’t do anything about it? It was an obvious troll job and you didn’t do crap.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 21019
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 925 times
That's all I've been saying; I kept my mouth shut for a while but I'm human and eventually I'm going to crack and respond -- which I did.dplank wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 1:01 pm For example, I thought TMP was going after G08 too much recently and was hitting him across several threads unnecessarily - an easy fix to that would be a simple moderator message that isn't some vague "cut the crap" thing, but a very specific "Do not quote or attack this specific user again, or there will be a suspension" message.
Appreciate it, @dplank
“Here we go. Here we go. Let’s focus. Let’s get after it.”
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 1514 times
@dplank
I went after G08 because he pulled a total 180 on Fields on a dime. Then came the condescension, the LARPing and the dishonesty about him watching a shit ton of football games in like two days.
So yeah I don’t like the tone he took and I don’t like that he never owned the flip flopping.
Then him being a Protected Class with the mods, and they even admit as much in this thread right here, puts the cherry on top.
So I think the guy is a colossal prick, he’s dishonest and the mods look the other way because they’ve known him forever including lifting a ban on him in five minutes after he did ANOTHER troll job immediately coming back from his ban.
I went after G08 because he pulled a total 180 on Fields on a dime. Then came the condescension, the LARPing and the dishonesty about him watching a shit ton of football games in like two days.
So yeah I don’t like the tone he took and I don’t like that he never owned the flip flopping.
Then him being a Protected Class with the mods, and they even admit as much in this thread right here, puts the cherry on top.
So I think the guy is a colossal prick, he’s dishonest and the mods look the other way because they’ve known him forever including lifting a ban on him in five minutes after he did ANOTHER troll job immediately coming back from his ban.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 21019
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 925 times
Wait.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 1:16 pmIt’s no secret that I absolutely cannot stand you and this goes back years. This isn’t the first time you’ve shown a clear double standard to somebody in your clique.wab wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 12:58 pm
It’s not a dodge. I don’t know how clearly I can spell it out, but UOK decides who’s banned and for how long. We give input but it’s up to him. Thats how this works.
You have an issue with me and UOK because we go way back with G08, even though he’s also been suspended multiple times.
You have an issue with me and UOK because you believe we give Rich special treatment, even though UOK says with specificity above that he’s not seeing Rich do anything wrong. You’ve even gone so far as to concoct some conspiracy theory that Rich is my alt. That’s weird.
And you won’t engage UOK directly - you always do it through responses to me - because you ultimately know your fate is in his hands.
And just so I’m completely transparent, in spite of everything, I have zero issues with you being a member of this board. You have some really valuable insights when it comes to pure football discussions.
When I got back I reported G08’s sig to you based on the report closure from Wednesday afternoon? How come you didn’t do anything about it? It was an obvious troll job and you didn’t do crap.
You just admitted that you reported it... so how is it a troll job when you literally confirmed that your whining got my sig removed?
(the sig, by the way, was nothing more than one screenshot of a conversation we had on this very board: viewtopic.php?p=384483&hilit=robert+bruce#p384483)
Last edited by G08 on Thu Aug 01, 2024 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“Here we go. Here we go. Let’s focus. Let’s get after it.”
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 30573
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 162 times
- Been thanked: 2359 times
I absolutely did tell him to take down his sig when you reported it. He chose to alter it in the way he did and UOK deleted it completely. You can ask him if you want.The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 1:16 pmIt’s no secret that I absolutely cannot stand you and this goes back years. This isn’t the first time you’ve shown a clear double standard to somebody in your clique.wab wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 12:58 pm
It’s not a dodge. I don’t know how clearly I can spell it out, but UOK decides who’s banned and for how long. We give input but it’s up to him. Thats how this works.
You have an issue with me and UOK because we go way back with G08, even though he’s also been suspended multiple times.
You have an issue with me and UOK because you believe we give Rich special treatment, even though UOK says with specificity above that he’s not seeing Rich do anything wrong. You’ve even gone so far as to concoct some conspiracy theory that Rich is my alt. That’s weird.
And you won’t engage UOK directly - you always do it through responses to me - because you ultimately know your fate is in his hands.
And just so I’m completely transparent, in spite of everything, I have zero issues with you being a member of this board. You have some really valuable insights when it comes to pure football discussions.
When I got back I reported G08’s sig to you based on the report closure from Wednesday afternoon? How come you didn’t do anything about it? It was an obvious troll job and you didn’t do crap.
I don’t care if you can’t stand me. That changes nothing about how I’ll continue to moderate this board.
Speaking of which, I think you assume I have more power here than I do.