Would you listen on Keenan Allen?
Moderator: wab
-
- Journeyman
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 5:26 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 31 times
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 30631
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 2398 times
Help the team that the entire NFL is trying to beat, when we don't need to offload anyone and are trying to develop a rookie #1 overall pick at QB? Nah.
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 13459
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 1600 times
- Been thanked: 2772 times
Until KC loses their secret weapons, REF1 REF2 REF3, I think they’ll be fine.
ANOTHER late game questionable flag influenced their last game against the Chargers. It’s wild - every single week now.
ANOTHER late game questionable flag influenced their last game against the Chargers. It’s wild - every single week now.
- Ditka’s dictaphone
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
- Has thanked: 967 times
- Been thanked: 994 times
Depends what they’re offering, needs to be a R2 pick considering it’s likely to be a late one…..
Or do they want to trade us one of their Oline players?
Then I’m listening
Or do they want to trade us one of their Oline players?
Then I’m listening
(26/09/2023) Winner of the inaugural
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7587
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 498 times
- Been thanked: 943 times
Of course
But I don't know how much they're offering.
Typically teams aren't looking to replace an unavailable guy with an unavailable guy.
But I don't know how much they're offering.
Typically teams aren't looking to replace an unavailable guy with an unavailable guy.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4095
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 770 times
- Been thanked: 723 times
There certainly would be a lot of variables.
How does this impact Caleb Williams' development?
What is KC willing to give up?
Is Keenan receptive?
I don't know that I'd make a deal, but I'd listen.
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
- grendel2000
- Player of the Month
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2019 12:01 pm
- Has thanked: 162 times
- Been thanked: 163 times
Ditto.thunderspirit wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 1:54 pmThere certainly would be a lot of variables.
How does this impact Caleb Williams' development?
What is KC willing to give up?
Is Keenan receptive?
I don't know that I'd make a deal, but I'd listen.
As has been pointed out in the past, Keenan was added well before we knew we'd get Odunze. Obviously, we don't need to move him, but if it was for the right piece of the puzzle I'd definitely consider it, given how good Odunze looks so far and the fact that we only have KA for one year anyway at the moment. If we could add somebody who would make us better for a few years I'd definitely consider it.
-
- Journeyman
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 5:26 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 31 times
Or better yet, any other desperate NFL needy team who might have a serviceable Olineman?
- Bearfacts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2451
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:33 am
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 1496 times
- Been thanked: 363 times
I'd need far better than just a "serviceable level" OL. We have plenty of those already. Keenan Allen is a front line starter.malagabears wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:15 pm Or better yet, any other desperate NFL needy team who might have a serviceable Olineman?
- Arkansasbear
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 580 times
- Been thanked: 927 times
Have to listen.
Doesn't K.C. have a starting OG who is set to be free agent Trey Smith maybe????
Doesn't K.C. have a starting OG who is set to be free agent Trey Smith maybe????
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 13459
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 1600 times
- Been thanked: 2772 times
I doubt we’d get much so I’d rather keep him for CWs sake
- Ditka’s dictaphone
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
- Has thanked: 967 times
- Been thanked: 994 times
I want CW to focus on DJ and Rome.
Keenan is not a future Bear.
I’m listening
Keenan is not a future Bear.
I’m listening
(26/09/2023) Winner of the inaugural
- HisRoyalSweetness
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7784
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 2678 times
Why would any team be interested in a WR battling a reported bone spur/plantar fasciitis which has already caused him to miss 2 of 4 games and not finish a third, let alone one who will cost the remainder of a $23m contract before hitting free agency?
If Poles got an offer equivalent to what he gave up, i.e. a 4th rounder, then he should seriously consider it because Allen's little help to Williams if he keeps missing time or is hampered all year. 7 catches on 14 targets for 48 yards in two games isn't production that should be difficult to replace. It's also not production that is likely to entice KC or any other team to think he'd be worth acquiring despite his injury issues.
If Poles got an offer equivalent to what he gave up, i.e. a 4th rounder, then he should seriously consider it because Allen's little help to Williams if he keeps missing time or is hampered all year. 7 catches on 14 targets for 48 yards in two games isn't production that should be difficult to replace. It's also not production that is likely to entice KC or any other team to think he'd be worth acquiring despite his injury issues.
Arise Sir Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXdXRP6Hi-U
- LacertineForest
- MVP
- Posts: 1913
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Has thanked: 2407 times
- Been thanked: 439 times
Maybe they can sweeten the deal if they throw in VelusHisRoyalSweetness wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 3:35 pm Why would any team be interested in a WR battling a reported bone spur/plantar fasciitis which has already caused him to miss 2 of 4 games and not finish a third, let alone one who will cost the remainder of a $23m contract before hitting free agency?
If Poles got an offer equivalent to what he gave up, i.e. a 4th rounder, then he should seriously consider it because Allen's little help to Williams if he keeps missing time or is hampered all year. 7 catches on 14 targets for 48 yards in two games isn't production that should be difficult to replace. It's also not production that is likely to entice KC or any other team to think he'd be worth acquiring despite his injury issues.
- Otis Day
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8294
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
- Location: Armpit of IL.
- Has thanked: 143 times
- Been thanked: 406 times
Maybe playing with Mahomes would be a miracle cure.HisRoyalSweetness wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 3:35 pm Why would any team be interested in a WR battling a reported bone spur/plantar fasciitis which has already caused him to miss 2 of 4 games and not finish a third, let alone one who will cost the remainder of a $23m contract before hitting free agency?
If Poles got an offer equivalent to what he gave up, i.e. a 4th rounder, then he should seriously consider it because Allen's little help to Williams if he keeps missing time or is hampered all year. 7 catches on 14 targets for 48 yards in two games isn't production that should be difficult to replace. It's also not production that is likely to entice KC or any other team to think he'd be worth acquiring despite his injury issues.
- Ditka’s dictaphone
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
- Has thanked: 967 times
- Been thanked: 994 times
No, that’ll sour the dealLacertineForest wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 3:46 pmMaybe they can sweeten the deal if they throw in VelusHisRoyalSweetness wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 3:35 pm Why would any team be interested in a WR battling a reported bone spur/plantar fasciitis which has already caused him to miss 2 of 4 games and not finish a third, let alone one who will cost the remainder of a $23m contract before hitting free agency?
If Poles got an offer equivalent to what he gave up, i.e. a 4th rounder, then he should seriously consider it because Allen's little help to Williams if he keeps missing time or is hampered all year. 7 catches on 14 targets for 48 yards in two games isn't production that should be difficult to replace. It's also not production that is likely to entice KC or any other team to think he'd be worth acquiring despite his injury issues.
(26/09/2023) Winner of the inaugural
- UOK
- Site Admin
- Posts: 25498
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Champaign, IL
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 1106 times
No.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2676
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:56 am
- Has thanked: 2934 times
- Been thanked: 569 times
I'll probably listen to any offer, as you always should. But they'd have to overpay. They offer me a 1st or their best olineman? Sure let's talk.
Otherwise Keenan Allen is of more benefit to the Bears and CW development.
Otherwise Keenan Allen is of more benefit to the Bears and CW development.
- malk
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3930
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 313 times
A 3rd round pick and $17.5m of cap space sure would be nice to out towards offensive linemen next year...
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
- BreadNCircuses
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:34 pm
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
I agree about listening, but if we could get an upgrade over the 4th we traded for Allen, I'd probably take it all else being equalHurricaneBear wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 4:39 pm I'll probably listen to any offer, as you always should. But they'd have to overpay. They offer me a 1st or their best olineman? Sure let's talk.
Otherwise Keenan Allen is of more benefit to the Bears and CW development.
2023 Preseason Downside prediction:
5-6 wins, never really healthy all season, a constant shuffling.
We're potentially in a position to draft in the Top 5 again, depending on the Carolina team, and probably have a low-teens (or better) pick ourselves.
5-6 wins, never really healthy all season, a constant shuffling.
We're potentially in a position to draft in the Top 5 again, depending on the Carolina team, and probably have a low-teens (or better) pick ourselves.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8765
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 610 times
- Been thanked: 729 times
Say they offer a 2nd Rounder - Straight UpHurricaneBear wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 4:39 pm I'll probably listen to any offer, as you always should. But they'd have to overpay. They offer me a 1st or their best olineman? Sure let's talk.
Otherwise Keenan Allen is of more benefit to the Bears and CW development.
What say you?
- Ditka’s dictaphone
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
- Has thanked: 967 times
- Been thanked: 994 times
DealRichH55 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 10:59 pmSay they offer a 2nd Rounder - Straight UpHurricaneBear wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 4:39 pm I'll probably listen to any offer, as you always should. But they'd have to overpay. They offer me a 1st or their best olineman? Sure let's talk.
Otherwise Keenan Allen is of more benefit to the Bears and CW development.
What say you?
It’s a late one, of course, but I’d take it.
DJ 1
Rome 2
Figure the rest out
(26/09/2023) Winner of the inaugural
- Shadow
- Crafty Veteran
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2022 11:47 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 185 times
Anything at 3rd round or better you have to take. Free draft upgrade and cap relief.
Anything at the 4th or later has to come with an O-Lineman in the trade. Or maybe even a promising D-Lineman.
As stated above "Keenan was brought in, in case they didn't get Odunze. Well, they got him so Keenan is an expensive, nice to have, luxury.
I make this trade it it comes to pass.
Anything at the 4th or later has to come with an O-Lineman in the trade. Or maybe even a promising D-Lineman.
As stated above "Keenan was brought in, in case they didn't get Odunze. Well, they got him so Keenan is an expensive, nice to have, luxury.
I make this trade it it comes to pass.
A new Era begins in the NFC North!
Happily, it finally involves the Bears....
Happily, it finally involves the Bears....
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2676
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:56 am
- Has thanked: 2934 times
- Been thanked: 569 times
Honestly not sure. The KC 2nd is gonna be 28th or later in the round so alot more like a 3rd. I'm looking at it as if Poles plays his cards right and let's Keenan walk, we can still comp a 5th rounder.RichH55 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 10:59 pmSay they offer a 2nd Rounder - Straight UpHurricaneBear wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 4:39 pm I'll probably listen to any offer, as you always should. But they'd have to overpay. They offer me a 1st or their best olineman? Sure let's talk.
Otherwise Keenan Allen is of more benefit to the Bears and CW development.
What say you?
I almost included 2nd with my original post. If it was say, the Raiders 2nd id definitely do it. The insurance of having 3 legit NFL receivers in Calebs rookie year means ALOT to me.
So id probably take the 2nd? Will they take Stone Hands Jones also because then yes anything to get that bum off the roster.
Id much rather swap him for a starting olineman fwiw.
- malk
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3930
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 313 times
I think the reason we don't do it is that some of the staff are feeling a warmish seat and if we trade him and then either Moore or Odunze get injured there'll be all kinds of grief.
Still, Moore, Odunze, Kmet and Swift, plus the cameo from Carter and some prior pedigree from Everett even if we haven't seen it yet... that should be more than enough. It's the cap space we might end up needing as much as the pick. I think our line will continue to improve but none of them look good so it looks like we'll need to go after it in the draft and in free agency...
Still, Moore, Odunze, Kmet and Swift, plus the cameo from Carter and some prior pedigree from Everett even if we haven't seen it yet... that should be more than enough. It's the cap space we might end up needing as much as the pick. I think our line will continue to improve but none of them look good so it looks like we'll need to go after it in the draft and in free agency...
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
- UOK
- Site Admin
- Posts: 25498
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Champaign, IL
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 1106 times
I don't think the WR depth is good enough to just dump Allen for anything less than a first or early second. Plus,
1. It's a bad look to give up on one of your rookie QBs favorite targets
2. They gave up a 4th to get him, so getting even a 3rd back is barely a profit
3. The Bears aren't 0-4/1-3 and in a position to be sellers....yet
1. It's a bad look to give up on one of your rookie QBs favorite targets
2. They gave up a 4th to get him, so getting even a 3rd back is barely a profit
3. The Bears aren't 0-4/1-3 and in a position to be sellers....yet
- HisRoyalSweetness
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7784
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 2678 times
Is there really much likelihood Poles would get a R5 if he doesn't re-sign Allen? That's the maximum for him as a 10+ year vet and there are all sorts of offsets. Poles will have $70m in cap space and few other in-house free agents to extend, so you have to think he's going to be doing some shopping in the offseason. I'll be quite surprised if the Bears get any comp picks.HurricaneBear wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 7:07 am Honestly not sure. The KC 2nd is gonna be 28th or later in the round so alot more like a 3rd. I'm looking at it as if Poles plays his cards right and let's Keenan walk, we can still comp a 5th rounder.
The only reason for considering trading Allen at this point is his health, which is the very same reason why I can't see another team being willing to make an offer.
Arise Sir Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXdXRP6Hi-U
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8765
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 610 times
- Been thanked: 729 times
Comp picks - now we are talking my languageHisRoyalSweetness wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 9:16 amIs there really much likelihood Poles would get a R5 if he doesn't re-sign Allen? That's the maximum for him as a 10+ year vet and there are all sorts of offsets. Poles will have $70m in cap space and few other in-house free agents to extend, so you have to think he's going to be doing some shopping in the offseason. I'll be quite surprised if the Bears get any comp picks.HurricaneBear wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 7:07 am Honestly not sure. The KC 2nd is gonna be 28th or later in the round so alot more like a 3rd. I'm looking at it as if Poles plays his cards right and let's Keenan walk, we can still comp a 5th rounder.
The only reason for considering trading Allen at this point is his health, which is the very same reason why I can't see another team being willing to make an offer.
5th is the maximum on Keenan - yes. BUT remember its a totality thing (Granted this assumes a big bump in Jenkins play) But he is MOST likely to play a roll as a cancellation signing IMHO.
If Jenkins signs a big contract (looking less likely by the Week - At least as to the R3 Comp pick range) - that is what you need to protect (Don't make the AQM mistake again!). (*)
I think this team is good and deep and relatively young. - But also expecting ZERO FA signings (I guess you could stick to guys who get cut) is a Decent sized ask.
(*) If you are gonna sign a guy like Trey Smith to a deal at/near the top of the Guard market- then all bets are off (though then you are more likely to get the 5th for Allen - Just not the 3rd/4th for Jenkins)
But Allen leaving via FA- would let you do something like sign Ryan Kelly to a decent contract and still get the Jenkins pick